Title: Comparison of the Adjunctive Effect of Tranexamic Acid and Infusion Oxytocin on Blood Loss at Caesarean Section - A Randomised Study

Authors: *Gabriel Dogbanya, Marliyya S Zayyan, Adekunle O Oguntayo, Abimbola O Kolawole, Yahya Anisah, Yusuf S Yakubu, Zaro Boysungni, Ekeng Offiong, Ogudugu Festus. Ilikannu Okwuchukwu Samuel. Etukudo Akwaowo Joshua

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v12i04.07

Abstract

Background: Postpartum haemorrhage is a major complication at caesarean section. Tranexamic acid and oxytocin infusion have been used for prophylaxis.

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of prophylactic adjunctive use of Tranexamic acid and oxytocin infusion at caesarean section to reduce blood loss.

Method: A randomised study at ABUTH, Zaria, in which 144 women, scheduled for elective or emergency caesarean section at term, were sequentially randomised into two groups of 72 each. The Tranexamic acid group received 1g intravenous and 500ml of Normal saline as placebo while the oxytocin group received placebo and 500ml of Normal saline containing 20IU of oxytocin after delivery of the neonate. Both adjunctive groups received 10IU Oxytocin as part of AMTSL. Trial registry: PACTR 202004568331645. Ethical approval: ABUTHZ/HREC/D37/2018.

Result: There was no significant difference in parity, gestational age and indication for caesarean section in both groups p<0.287, 0.270 and 0.095 respectively. There was no significant difference in primary outcome with mean blood loss 561.06 ± 209.23ml versus 567.78 ± 205.91ml in the Tranexamic acid and oxytocin group respectively, p<0.847. Need for additional uterotonic agent and side effect profile were significantly reduced in the Tranexamic acid group. There was no significant difference in need for blood transfusion and haemodynamic status of parturient in both groups. There was no significant difference in mean blood loss at emergency versus elective caeserean section, 565.83± 205.51ml versus 567.97± 217.42ml respectively, p<0.921.Blood loss in those with 1 previous CS was comparable in both groups 537.75± 209.69ml versus 522.05± 176.43ml respectively, p<0.374, however, for those with 2 or more CS, while there was a clinical (reduction) difference of 80ml in the Tranexamic acid group, it was not statistically significant. 594.55± 0.91ml versus 674.06± 1.99ml respectively, p<0.476.

Conclusion: There is comparative adjunctive efficacy of Tranexamic acid and oxytocin infusion at caesarean section.

Keywords: Caesarean delivery, Oxytocin infusion, Tranexamic acid, Postpartum haemorrhage.

References

  1. WHO recommendations for the prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage. WHO: Geneva.2013. WHO/RHR/14.20.
  2. Kramer MS, Berg C., Abenhaim H., Dahhov M. Rouleau J., Mehrabadi A., et al. Incidence, risk factors and temporal trends in sever PPH. AJOG. 2013: 209(5): 449.
  3. Sofiene BM, Liadi BN, Yahaya M, Ben MS, Hannachi Z, Ben Nasir L, Marzougui Y. Maghrebi  A comparison of two doses of tranexamic acid to reduce blood loss during caesarean delivery. Glob Anesth Perioper Med. 2015. 1(4): 93-95.
  4. Dyer RA, Butwick AJ, Carvalho B. Oxytocin for labour and caesarean delivery: implications for the anaesthesiologist. Current opinion in Anaesthesiology.2011.24 (3): 255-61.
  5. Practice bulletin: clinical management guidelines for obstetricians-gynaecologist. Number 76. Postpartum haemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108:1039-47.
  6. Sheehan SR et al. Oxytocin bolus versus oxytocin bolus and infusion for control of blood loss at caesarean section: double blind, placebo controlled trial. BMJ 2011; 343: 4661.
  7. Dhivya Lakshmi SJ, Abraham R. Role of prophylactic Tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss during elective caesarean section: A randomised controlled study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016.10 (12):17-21.
  8. Novikova N. Hofmeyr GJ. Tranexamic acid for preventing postpartum haemorrhage. Cochrane database syst Rev, 2010.7 .CD007872.
  9. Gungorduk K, Asicioglu O, Celikkol O, Olgac Y, Ark C. Use of additional oxytocin to reduce blood loss at elective caesarean section: A randomized controlled trial. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 50:36-9.
  10. Obi VO, Umeora OUJ, Dimejesi IBO, Asiegbu O, Mgbafulu CC, Ifemelumma CC,Obi CN. Efficacy of intravenous tranexamic acid at reducing blood loss during elective caesarean section in Abakaliki: A double blind randomized placebo controlled trial. Afr. J. Med. Health Sci. 2019; 18(2):10-17.
  11. Ahmed MR, Ahmed WAS, Madny EH, Arafa AM (2015). Said MM. Efficacy of tranexamic acid in decreasing blood loss in elective caesarean delivery. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 28(9):1014-1018.
  12. Abdul-Aleem H, Alhusaini TK, Abdul-Aleem A,Menoufy M, Gulmezoglu A.M. Effectiveness of tranexamic acid on blood loss in patients undergoing elective caesarean section: a randomized clinical trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013; 26(17):1705-1709.
  13. Kuzume A, Suga S, Sugumi S, Yamashita H. The routine use of prophylactic oxytocin in the third stage of labour to reduce maternal blood loss. Journal of pregnancy. 2017: 2017.
  14. Adanikin AI, Orji E, Adanikin PO, Olaniyan O: Comparative study of rectal misoprostol to oxytocin infusion in preventing postpartum haemorrhage after caesarean section. NJOG. 2013.8(2):34-37.
  15. Movafegh A, Eslamian L, Dorabadi A. Effect of intravenous tranexamic acid administered on blood loss during and after caesarean delivery. International Journal of Gynecology and obstetrics. 2011;115(3):224-26
  16. Roy I, Chakraborty S, Mukhopadhyay S. Role of intravenous tranexamic acid on caesarean blood loss: A prospective randomized study. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 35:49-53.
  17. Thavare MG,Patil AS. To study the effect of tranexamic acid on blood loss during and after caesarean section. MVP Journal of Medical Sciences.2019; 6:1.
  18. Bhatia SK, Deshpande H. Role of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss during and after caesarean section. Med J DY Patil Univ. 2015; 8:21-5.

Corresponding Author

Gabriel Dogbanya

Dept of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital Zaria, Nigeria