Title: Pathogenesis of EMA negative PR negative Microcystic Meningioma: A Case Report

Authors: Supriya Mehrotra, Bandana Mehrotra, Sanjay Mehrotra, Ashok Kumar Kapoor, Neha Gupta, Hari Shyam

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v12i02.01

Abstract

A patient, aged 35 years female complained of headache. CT examination revealed a non-succable tumor at anterolateral aspect of dura. Tumor extended from the right cervicomedullary junction upto C7 level. Tumor was excised and multiple soft tissue pieces, together measuring 1.5×1×1 cm were cellected. All the pieces were sectioned. Tumor had a sieve-like and cyst-like appearance. Section showed a circumscribed globular tumor which consisted of proliferated bland spindle cells. Tumor had an edematous stroma and presented a microcystic appearance. The cells had elongated ovoid nuclei and mild eosinophilic cytoplasm. Several thin-walled vascular spaces were also seen in the tumor. Strong positive reaction was obtained with an anti-S100 antibody, suggesting a neural origin of tumor cells. Further, anti-Ki 67 antibody gave mild reaction (Ki67 index was 12%) suggesting benign neoplasm. Anti-CD 34 and anti-D2.40antibodies gave positive reactions (2+) with small blood vessels of the tumor.

Keywords: Benign cystic neoplasm with similar behavior among various subtypes.

References

  1. Cuccurulio L, Luongo M, Accardo M. Ultrastructural profile of microcystic meningioma. Pathologica 2009;101(3):115-118.
  2. Kleihues P, Burger PC, ScheihauerBW: The new classification of brain tumors, Brain Path 1993;3:255-268.
  3. Michaud J, Gagne. F. Microcystic meningioma - Clinicopathological report of eight cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1983;107:75-80.
  4. Kim SH, Kim DG, Kim C-Y, Choe G, Kim C-Y,Choe G et al. Microcystic meningioma: The characteristic neuroradiological findings. J Korean NeurosurgSoc 2003; 34:401-406.
  5. Harrison JD, Rose PE. Myxoid meningioma: histochemistry and electron microscopy, ActaNeuropathol (Br) 1985;31:179-185.
  6. Schober R, Himuro H, Wechsler W. Cystic changes and vascular permeability in meningiomas. ClinNeuropathol 1998;7:16-21.
  7. Eimoto T, Hashimoto K: Vacuolated meningioma : A light and electron microscopic study. ActaPatholJÞn 1977;27:557-566
  8. Bromley PJ, Grymaloski MR, JetlerPJ: CT appearance of microcystic meningioma. J Comput Assist Tumagr 1996;20:570-572.
  9. Paek SH, Kim CY, Kim YY, Park IA , Kim MS. Kim DG et al. Correlation of clinical and biological parameters with peritumoral edema in meningioma. J Neuroncol 2002;60:235-245.
  10. Mukherjee S, Ghosh SN, Chatterjee IJ, Chatterjee S. Detection of progesterone receptor and the correlation in Ki-67 labelling index in meningioma. Neurology India 2011; 59(6):817-822.
  11. NishioS, Takeshita I, Morioka T, Fukui Mi. Microcystic meningioma; clinicopathological features of 6 Cases. Neurolog Res 1994;16: 251-255.

Corresponding Author

Dr. Ashok Kumar Kapoor

RML Mehrotra Pathology Pvt. Ltd. B-171,Nirala Nagar, Lucknow- 226020, Uttar Pradesh, India