Title: Clinicopathological Spectrum of Interface Dermatitis

Authors: Dr Prakriti Mishra, Dr Srilatha P.S

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v12i01.06

Abstract

Introduction: Interface dermatitis, which is characterized by variable dermoepidermal interface inflammation and the presence of vacuolar damage to the basal layer, which causes keratinocyte death or necrosis, is a broad term that encompasses many distinct illnesses. . Aim: The present study was planned to correlate the significance of Interface dermatitis with their clinico-pathological aspects.

Methodology: This was a retrospective study conducted on 170 cases diagnosed as interface dermatitis over a period of two years. Skin biopsy samples received from the outpatient department were analysed. 

Results: In the present study, a total of 170 cases were analysed which clinically presented as papulosquamous disorders. On histopathological diagnosis, LP and its variants were the most common type disorder. The most consistent histolopathological characteristic feature noted was basal cell vacuolar degeneration in the epidermis along with a band of lymphocytic inflammatory infiltrate. Clinicopathologic concordance was seen in 86.5% cases.

Conclusion: Thus, combination of the histologic details, in correlation with the clinical data helps in arriving at a specific diagnosis of various ID.

References

  1. Patterson JW. The spectrum of lichenoid dermatitis. J Cutan Pathol 1991;18:67-74.
  2. Biswas A. (2016).Pearls and Pitfalls in Inflammatory Dermatopathology. In Dermatopathology (pp59).Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  3. Maheshwari GR, Mehta HH, Nikam V. Clinico-histopathological correlation for diagnosis of lichenoid interface dermatoses. J Dermatol Dermatol Surg 2016;20:115-24.6
  4. Kulkarni V, Bijjaragi S, Prashanth R, Kumar P. Evolution of a pragmatic algorithm based approach for sub-categorization of Interface dermatitis – A Clinico-Pathological study. Indian J Pathol Oncol 2016;3(1):60-9.
  5. Hegde VK, Khadilkar UN. A clinicopathological study of interface dermatitis. Indian JPathol Microbiol 2014;57:386-9.
  6. Le Boit PE. Interface dermatitis. How specific are its histopathologic features? Arch Dermatol 1993;129:1324-8.
  7. Pinkus H. Lichenoid Tissue Reactions. A speculative review of the clinical spectrum of epidermal basal cell damage with special reference to erythema dyschromicum perstans. Arch Dermatol 1973: 840-46.
  8. Kumar SA, Nandakumar G. A study of interface dermatitis with clinical correlation. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2015 May 25;4(42):7343–52.
  9. Ireddy SG, Udbalkar SG. Epidemiological study of lichen planus. BMR Med 2014;1:1-9.
  10. Batchu VR, Panthalla VL, Kumar PVK, Penchalaiah K. A clinicopathological study on interface dermatitis. Int J Res Dermatol 2022;8:457-65.
  11. Desai S, Badwe A , Nikam B, Shetty S. Histopathological study of Interface dermatitis with its clinical correlation. International journal of healthcare & Biomedical research 2014;2(3):324-29.
  12. Sarin N, Anand P, Khurana V.K. Lichenoid tissue reactions- a study of various histomorphological patterns with clinical correlation and review of literature. Int J Rec Scientific Res. 2017;8(9):20409- 15.
  13. Tickoo U, Bubna AK, Subramanyam S, Veeraraghavan M, Rangarajan S, Sankarasubramanian A. A clinicopathologic study of lichen planus at a tertiary health care centre in south India. Pigment Int 2016; 3:96-101.
  14. Dhar R, Gaikwad P, Sahai J et.al. Histopathological spectrum of interface dermatitis and its clinicopathological correlation. Int J Health Sci Res. 2020; 10(12):17-24.

Corresponding Author

Dr Prakriti Mishra

Postgraduate Student, Department of Pathology, Kasturba Medical College Manipal