Details
Category: Volume 08 Issue 10 October 2020
Hits: 966

Title: Non-operative management inblunt splenic injury

Authors: Arvind Anchawle, Ashish Naik, Rahul Muske, Ritesh Dhanbhar

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v8i10.29

Abstract

Introduction: Conservative management of splenic injury had a great success rate in past decade. Newer imaging modalities have helped in improving its outcome by refining desigens. There is need of study for safety and efficacy of conservatively managed splenic injuries.

Aim: Study on outcome of Conservative management of splenic injuries at tertiary care hospital.

Methods: Retrospective study was carried out at DVVPFʼS Medical College and Hospital, Ahmednagar; from October 2017 To April 2019.In this study 30 patient with splenic injury were included.

Results: Out of 30 cases of spleenic injury, we were successfully managed 7 cases conservatively. None of the cases in our study, in which we had decided for conservative management, were subjected to an exploratory laparotomy.

Conclusion: Patients which are hemodynamically stable and has Grade I or Grade II injuries according to the AAST classification must be tried for Conservative management.

References

  1. Beuran M Non-operative management of splenic trauma. Journal of Medicine and Life 2012; 5(1):47‐58.
  2. Lucas CE. Splenic Trauma Choice of Management. Ann. Surg. 1991; 213: 98–112.
  3. Uranüs S, Pfeifer J. Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury. World J. Surg. 2001;25:1405–1407.
  4. Meguid AA, Bair HA, Howells GA, Bendick PJ, Kerr HH, Villalba MR. Prospective evaluation of criteria for the nonoperative management of blunt splenic trauma. Am Surg. 2003;69(3): 238-42.
  5. Stassen NA, Bhullar I, Cheng JD, Crandall ML, Friese RS, Guillamondegui OD, et al. Selective nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73:5:4:294-300.
  6. Zarzaur BL, Kozar RA, Fabian TC, Coimbra R. A survey of American Association for the Surgery of Trauma member practices in the management of blunt splenic injury. J Trauma. 2011;70(5):1026-31
  7. Bhullar IS, Frykberg ER, Tepas JJ 3rd, Siragusa D, Loper T, Kerwin AJ. At first blush: absence of computed tomography contrast extravasation in Grade IV or V adult blunt splenic trauma should not preclude angioembolization. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(1): 105-11.
  8. H Scott Bjerke. Medscape. Article 432823 (https:// emedicine.medscape.com/article/ 432823-treatment)
  9. Cocanour CS, Moore FA , Ware DN , Marvin RG , Clark JM , Duke JH . Delayed complications of nonoperative management of blunt adult splenictrauma. Arch Surg 1998;133:619–25.
  10. Peitzman, Andrew B, et al.Blunt splenic injury in adults: Multi-institutional study of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 2000;49:2: 177-189.
  11. Federico Coccolini, et al. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2017;12:40.
  12. Myers JG, et al. Blunt splenic injuries: dedicated trauma surgeons can achieve a high rate of nonoperative success in patients of all ages. J Trauma. 2000; 48:5:801-5.

Corresponding Author

Dr Ritesh Dhanbhar