Title: Mycoplasma pneumonia infection in Cancer Patients at a Regional Cancer Center, South India
Authors: Sumathi B.G., Shafiulla Md., Lakshmaiah KC., Lokanatha D
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v4i4.65
Abstract
Purpose: Mycoplasma pneumoniae (M.pneumoniae) forms one of the major causes of the
community acquired respiratory infections in paediatric and adult populations. A prospective study was done to evaluate the frequency of M.pneumoniae infections in cancer patients at a regional cancer hospital in South India.
Materials and Methods: Blood was sampled from 65 adult patients with confirmed solid and haematological malignancies during febrile episodes. Serological estimation for IgM antibodies to M. pneumoniae was done using IgM enzyme – linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (EuroImmun, Germany). Thirty age and sex matched normal healthy adult subjects served as control.
Results: The breakup of the patients was as follows: Of the 65 patients 51(78.46%) were males and 14 were females (21.53%). Of the total number studied 51(78.46%) had solid tumor while 14 (21.53%) patients had haematological malignancy. Patient who received chemotherapy alone were 18 (27.69%) radiotherapy 14 (21.53%);surgery 10(15.38%); chemotherapy and radiotherapy16(24.61%); chemotherapy and surgery 3(4.61%); radiotherapy and surgery 3 (4.61%); chemotherapy and radiotherapy and surgery1(1.53%).
Only one female patient of squamous cell carcinoma post cricoid had IgM antibodies to M. pneumoniae. Two of the 30 control sera were also positive for IgM antibodies to M. Pneumonia
Conclusion: From our study we inferred that the frequency of M.pneumoniae infections amongst cancer patients at our centre is infrequent and low. However, detection of IgM antibodies by serological assay is not the only ideal test to know the true frequency of M.pneumoniae infection.The actual frequency could be assessed by simultaneous detection of M.pneumoniae DNA in the sputa along with detection of IgM during febrile episodes .
Keywords: M.pneumoniae, Immunocompromised, IgM ELISA, Cancer, Solid tumors, haematological malignancy.
References
1. Cassell GH, Clyde WA, Davis JK. Mycoplasmal respiratory infections. In: Razin S, Tully JG, editors. The Mycoplasmas. New York: Academic Press; 1985; 66-106.
2. Shimuzu T, Mochizuki H, Kato M, Shjigeta M, Morikawa A, Hori T. Immunoglobulin levels, number of eosinophils in the peripheral blood and bronchial hypersensitivity in children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Japanese J. of Allergology. 1991;40:21-7.
3. Sabato AR, Martin AJ, Marmion BP, Kok TW, Cooper DM. Mycoplasma pneumoniae: Acute illness, antibiotics,and subsequent pulmonary function. Arch Dis Child 84;59:1034-7.
4. Nilsson AC, Björkman P, Welinder-Olsson C, Widell A, and Persson K. Clinical severity of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection is associated with bacterial load in oropharyngeal secretions but not with Mycoplasma pneumoniae genotype.BMC Infectious Diseases. 2010;10:39.
5. A G Wardman, D W Milligan, J A Child, I W Delamore, N J Cooke Pulmonary infiltrates and adult acute leukaemia: empirical treatment and survival related to the extent of pulmonary radiological disease. Thorax1984;39:568-71.
6. Fanta CH, Pennington JE. Fever and new lung infiltrates in the immunecompr-omised host. Clin Chest Med; 1981:19-39.
7. Matthay BA, Greene WH. Pulmonary infections in the immunocompromised patient. Med Clin North Am. 1980; 64:529-51.
8. Lei Zhang, Zhi-Yong Zong ,Yan-Bin Liu, Hui Ye & Xiao-Ju Lv. PCR versus serology for diagnosing Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection: A systematic review & meta-analysis.Indian J Med Res 2011;134:270-80.
9. Riitta Ra¨ ty, Esa Ro¨nkko¨ and Marjaana Kleemola. Sample type is crucial to the diagnosis mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia by PCR. J of Med Microbiol.2005; 54: 287–91.
10. Melissa B. R. Mycoplasma and cancer: in search of the link. Oncotarget 2011; 2: 271– 73.
11. Anna C Nilsson, Per Björkman1 and Kenneth Persson. Polymerase chain reaction is Superior to serology for the diagnosis of acute Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection and reveals a high rate of persistent infection. BMC Microbiology 2008;8:2180-93.
12. Ligia. S.C.F. Rabello, Jose R.L. Silva, Luciano C.P.Azevedo, Ivens Souza, Viviane B.L. Torres, Maíra M. Rosol-em, Thiago Lisboa, Marcio Soares, Jorge I.F.Salluh. Clinical Outcomes and Microbiological Characteristics of Severe Pneumonia in Cancer Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study. PLoS One 2015;3:1-13.
13. Marston BJ, Plouffe JF,File TM Jr,Hackman BA, Salstrom SJ, Lipman HB.et al.Incidence of community acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalisation. Results of a population–base active surve-illance study in Ohio.The Community-based Pneumonia Incinence Study Group. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:1709-18.
14. Srinivasan A, Gu Z, Smith T, Morgenstern M, Sunkara A, Kang G, Srivastava DK, Gaur AH,Leung W, Hayden RT. Prospective detection of respiratory pathogens in symptomatic children with cancer. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 13;3:99-104.
15. Carlos R. P, Margaret W L Mycoplasma pneumoniae as the Causative Agent for Pneumonia in the Immunocompromised Hos.,CHEST 1991; 3: 860- 61.
16. A. Müller, B. Kupfer, J. Vehreschild, O. Cornely, R. Kaiser, H. Seifert, S. Viazov, R. L. Tillmann,C. Franzen, A. Simon, O. Schildgen. Fatal Pneumonia Associated With Human Metapneumovirus (hmpv) in a Patient With Myeloid eukemia And Adenocarcinoma in the Lung. Eur J Med Res (2007) 12: 183-84.
17. KenB.Waites, DeborahF.Talkington. Mycoplasma pneumonia and Its Role as a Human Pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 2004;17:697-28.
18. Sillis, M. 1990. The limitations of IgM assays in the serological diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections. J. Med. Microbiol.33:253-58.
19. Petitjean, J., Vabret, A., Gouarin, S. & Freymuth, F. (2002). Evaluation of four Commercial immunoglobulinG(IgG)- and IgM-specific enzyme immunoassays for diagnosis Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections. J Clin Microbiol 40, 165–71.
20. Sillis, M. 1993.Modern methods for diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumonia pneumonia. RevMed.Microbiol. 4:24–31.
21. Clyde,W. A., Jr.1983. Mycoplasma pneumoniae respiratory disease Symposium: summation and significance. Yale J. Biol.Med.1983; 56:523- 27.