Comparative Evaluation of CT Enterography and MR Enterography in Evaluation of Small Bowel Pathologies

Volume 4 Issue 09 Sept 2016 Hits: 2355

Title: Comparative Evaluation of CT Enterography and MR Enterography in Evaluation of Small Bowel Pathologies

Authors: Dr Vanaja, Dr Hanumath Prasad, Dr Shanthi Sree.V, Dr Veena, Dr Anil Kumar, Dr Shivani Gogi

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v4i9.59

Abstract

Aims and objectives: 1) To study the role of CT Enterography and MR Enterography in diagnosing various small bowel diseases.2 )To compare the diagnostic significance of CT Enterography with MR Enterography 3)To evaluate the clinical significance of various imaging findings as detected on CT and MR enterography.

Summary: A prospective observational study done in 50 patients with clinical symptoms of small bowel diseases who underwent ileocolonoscopy were included in the study. CT and MR enterography was performed in all the patients and findings analyzed. Further they were followed up with HPE/Surgical findings. The sensitivity and specificity of CTE for diagnosing small bowel diseases was found to be 89.6% and 66.6% respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of MRE for diagnosing small bowel diseases was 88.8% and 78.2% respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of CTE for diagnosing crohn’s disease was 77.7% and 95.1% respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of MRE for diagnosing Crohn’s disease was 77.7% and 97.5% respectively.

Keywords: Small bowel imaging ,CT enterography, MR enterography.

References

1. SeungSoo Lee, MD, Tack Sun Oh, MD, Hye Jin Kim, MD, Jun-Won Chung, MD1Seong Ho Park, MD, Ah Young Kim, MD, and Hyun Kwon Ha, MD Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Diagnostic Performance of Multidetector CT Entero-graphy. Radiology 2008;247:64-79

2. Fidler J1. MR imaging of the small bowel. Radiol Clin North Am. 2007 Mar;45(2): 317-31.

3. Gölder SK1, Schreyer AG, Endlicher E, Feuerbach S, Schölmerich J, Kullmann F, Seitz J, Rogler G, HerfarthH.Comparison of capsule endoscopy and magnetic reson-ance (MR) enteroclysis in suspected small bowel disease.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006 Mar;21(2):97-104. Epub 2005 Apr 22.

4. Tolan DJ1, Greenhalgh R, Zealley IA, Halligan S, Taylor SA. MR enterographic manifestations of small bowel Crohn disease. Radiographics. 2010 Mar;30(2): 367-84. doi: 10.1148/rg.302095028.

5. Shauna Duigenan and Michael.S. Gee –Imaging of pediatric patients with inflame-matory bowel disease –AJR Oct 2012, Volume 199 ,Number 4 .

6. Michael Dam Jensen ,Jens Kjeldsen ,Soren Rafael Raelson & Torben Nathan– Diagnostic accuracies of MR enterography and CT Enterography in symptomatic Crohn’s Disease Scandanivian Journal of gastroenterology. Vol 46, 2011- Issue 16

7. Siddiki HA1, Fidler JL, Fletcher JG, Burton SS, Huprich JE, Hough DM, Johnson CD, Bruining DH, Loftus EV Jr, Sandborn WJ, Pardi DS, Mandrekar JN. Prospective comparison of state-of-the-art MR enterography and CT enterography in small-bowel Crohn'sdisease.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jul;193(1):113-121.

8. Luciana Costa-Silva; Tatiana Martins; Maria do Carmo Friche Passo CT enterogr- aphy: a preliminary experience in the evaluation of small bowel diseases Radiol Bras vol.43 no.5 São Paulo Sept./ Oct. 2010

9. Rakesh Sinha and Sudarshan Rawat1MRI enterography with divided dose oral preparation: Effect on bowel distension and diagnostic qualityIndian J Radiol Imaging. 2013 Jan-Mar; 23(1): 86–91.

10. Tolan DJ1, Greenhalgh R, Zealley IA, Halligan S, Taylor SA. MR enterographic manifestations of small bowel Crohn disease. Radiographics. 2010 Mar;30(2): 367-84. doi: 10.1148/rg.302095028.

11. Schreyer AG1, Geissler A, Albrich H, Schölmerich J, Feuerbach S, Rogler G, Völk M, Herfarth H. Abdominal MRI after enteroclysis or with oral contrast in patients with suspected or proven Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Jun;2(6):491-7.

Abstract

References

Corresponding Author

Editorial Policy

Frequency of Publication

Submission of Articles