Google Scholar

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published
Jun 10, 2015
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 24 Download : 18

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

A mobile ad hoc network (MANET) is a collection of wireless mobile nodes forming a dynamic network Topology without the aid of any existing network infrastructure or centralized administration. Each  node  participating  in  the  network  acts  as a host  and as a  router , means they have to forward packets and identify route as well. Random waypoint is the most common mobility model in most of the simulation based studies of various MANET routing protocols. The Group Mobility Model has been generated by Impact of Mobility Patterns on Routing in Ad-hoc Network (IMPORTANT). The present communication is an attempt to develop an improved version of Group Mobility Model named iRPGM, which provide the facility to assign number of nodes in a group according to demand. We have analyzed the Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR),  Average End to End delay, Average Throughput,  Normalized Routing Load (NRL) and number of Drop packets in CBR and TCP  traffic model using reactive routing protocol,  AODV and proactive routing protocol, DSDV . Research efforts have focused much in measuring their performance with unequal distribution of nodes in each group. Simulations has been carried out using NS-2 simulator

Keywords- MANET,  IMPORTANT, CBR, TCP, iRPGM, PDR, NRL,  NS-2.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Author Biographies

Smita Babele, Takshshilla Institute of Engineering and Technology, Jabalpur

M. Tech. Student, CSE

Prof Rucji Jain, Takshshilla Institute of Engineering and Technology, Jabalpur

Dept. of CSE
How to Cite
Babele, S., & Jain, P. R. (2015). MANET Routing Protocols with CBR and TCP Traffic using Improved Reference Point Group Mobility (iRPGM) Model. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Science and Technology, 2(06). Retrieved from https://igmpublication.org/ijetst.in/index.php/ijetst/article/view/732

References

1. N. H. Vaidya, "Mobile Ad hoc networks routing, mac and transport issues," Proceedings of the IEEE Inter- national Conference on Computer Communication INFOCOM, 2004.
2. Royer and Toh, “A Review of Current Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks”, IEEE Personal Communications, pp. 46-55, April 1999.
3. L. Breslau, D. Estrin, K. Fall, S. Floyd, J. Heidemann, A. Helmy, P. Huang, S. McCanne, K. Varadhan, Y. Xu, and H. Yu, "Advances in network simulation," IEEE Computer,V. 33, pp.59-67, May 2000.
4. Bindra, Maakar and Sangal, “Performance Evaluation of Two Reactive Routing Protocols of MANET using Group Mobility Model” , IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science, vol. 7, Issue 3, No.103, pp. 38-43, May 2010.
5. C. Perkins,& E. Royer, "Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing," Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and App’s (WMCSA1999), pp. 90-100, Feb. 1999.
6. Charles E. Perkins, Elizabeth M. Royer and S. Das, Ad-Hoc on Demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV), Draftietfmanet-aodv-05.txt, March 2000.
7. C. Cheng, R. Riley, and S. P. R. Kumar, "A loop-free extended bellman-ford routing protocol without bouncing effect," Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM, vol. 4, pp. 224-236, Sep. 1989.
8. Network Simulator, ns-2, http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/-ns/
9. Fan Bai, Ahmed Helmy, “A Framework to Systematically Analyze the Impact of Mobility on Performance of Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc networks," IEEE INFOCOM 2003.
10. L. Layuan, Y. Peiyan, and L. Chunlin, "Performance evaluation and simulations of routing protocols in Ad hoc networks," Computer Communications, vol. 30, pp. 1890-1998, 2007.
11. C. E. Perkins, E. M. Royer, S. R. Das, and M. K Marina, "Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for Ad Hoc networks," IEEE Personal Communications Magazine Special Issue on Adhoc Networking, vol. 8, pp. 16-28, Feb. 2001.