Google Scholar

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published
Mar 15, 2015
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 25 Download : 18

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

Certificate revocation is a crucial integral element to secure network communications. During this paper, we tend to specialize in the problem of certificate revocation to isolate attackers from any collaborating in network activities. For fast and correct certificate revocation, we tend to propose the Cluster-based Certificate Revocation with Vindication Capability (CCRVC) theme.

To overcome this drawback, the Cluster-based Certificate Revocation is projected with Vindication Capability (CCRVC) theme. Every cluster consists of a Cluster Head along side some Cluster Members (CMs) settled among the transmission vary of their cluster Head. Before nodes are a part of the network, they need to accumulate valid certificates from the Certification Authority (CA) that's to blame for distribution and management of certificates to any or all nodes.

In this paper, a Cross Layer increased Secure Routing theme (CLSRS) is introduced for achieving fault tolerance level and authentication rate. Cross layer is deployed to boost the network lifespan and network performance. The number of nodes capable of occlusive malicious nodes ablated over time. It eventually cause case malicious nodes will now not be revoked in timely manner. To boost the accuracy, the threshold-based mechanism is projected to judge and vindicate warned nodes as legitimate nodes or not, before ill them.

Accumulate valid certificates from the Certification Authority (CA) that's to blame for distribution and management of certificates to any or all nodes.

In this paper, a Cross Layer increased Secure Routing theme (CLSRS) is introduced for achieving fault tolerance level and authentication rate. Cross layer is deployed to boost the network lifespan and network performance.

The number of nodes capable of occlusive malicious nodes ablated over time. It eventually cause case malicious nodes will now not be revoked in timely manner. To boost the accuracy, the threshold-based mechanism is projected to judge and vindicate warned nodes as legitimate nodes or not, before ill them.

Index Terms— Cross Layer, certificate revocation, Diskless Checkpoint, security.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Author Biographies

V.S. Suresh Kumar, Research Scholar, Karpagam University, Coiambatore

Dept. of Computer Science 

 

Dr. K. Ravi Kumar, Tamil University, Thanjavur

Dept. of Compter Science
How to Cite
Kumar, V. S., & Kumar, D. K. R. (2015). Improving Cluster-Based Certificate Revocation and Integral Component CCRVC Scheme for Authentication in Mobile Adhoc Network. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Science and Technology, 2(03). Retrieved from https://igmpublication.org/ijetst.in/index.php/ijetst/article/view/555

References

1. Cluster-Based Certificate Revocation with Vindication Capability for Mobile circumstantial NetworksWei Liu, Student Member, IEEE, Hiroki Nishiyama, Member,IEEE, Nirwan Ansari, Fellow, IEEE, Jie Yang, and Nei Kato, Senior Member, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS, VOL. 24, NO. 2, Feb 2013
2. Huang, X. Yang, S. Yang, W. Yu, and X. Fu (Mar. 2011), ―A cross-layer approach handling link spatial property for wireless mesh access networks,‖ IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. , vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 1045–1058.
3. K. Park, H. Nishiyama, N. Ansari, and N. Kato, “Certificate Revocation to address False Accusations in Mobile circumstantial Networks,” Proc IEEE 71st transport Technology Conf. (VTC ’10),May 16-19, 2010.
4. Lai, P. Lin, W. Liao, and C.-M. Chen,(Jan. 2011),―A region-based cluster mechanism for channel access in transport circumstantial networks,‖ IEEE J. Sel. Areas C ommun., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 83–93.
5. Liu W., Nishiyama H., Ansari N. and Kato N. “A Study on Certificate Revocation in Mobile Adhoc Network,” Proc. IEEE Int’l Conf. Comm. (ICC), 2011.
6. Wei Liu, Student Member, IEEE, Hiroki Nishiyama, Member, IEEE, Nirwan Ansari, Fellow, IEEE, Jie Yang, and Nei Kato, Senior Member, IEEE, “Cluster-Based Certificate Revocation with Vindication Capability for Mobile circumstantial Networks”, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, Vol.24, No.2, 2013, pp.239-249.
7. Jens Mittag, Stylianos Papanastasiou, Hannes Hartenstein, Erik G. Strom, “Enabling correct Cross-Layer PHY/MAC/NET Simulation Studies of transport Communication Networks”, Proceedings of The IEEE - PIEEE , vol. 99, no. 7, pp. 1311-1326, 2011
8. J . L iu, X . J iang, H . N is h iyam a, and N . K ato, “Delay and capability in circumstantial m obile networks with f- forged relay algorithms ,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 2738–2751, Aug. 2011.
9. Clulow J. and Moore T. (2006) “Suicide for the Common Good: a replacement Strategy for credentials Revocation in Self-organizing Systems,” ACMSIGOPS operational Systems Rev., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 18-21.
10. Ascendable Network Technologies Qualnet, http://www.scalablenetworks. Com, 2012.
11. G. Arboit, C. Crepeau, C.R. Davis, and M. Maheswaran, “A Localized Certificate Revocation theme for Mobile circumstantial Networks,” circumstantial Network, vol. 6, no. 1, pp.17-31, Jan. 2008.
12. P. Sakarindr and N. Ansari Security Services in cluster Communications Over Wireless Infrastructure, Mobile circumstantial, and Wireless sensing element Networks , IEEE Wireless Comm., vol. 14, no. 5, pp.8-20, Oct. 2007.
13. B. Kannhavong, H. Nakayama, A. Jamalipour, Y. Nemoto, and N. Kato, A Survey of Routing Attacks in Edouard Manet , IEEE Wireless Comm. Magazine, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 85-91, Oct. 2007. Technology: cryptography and Computing, vol. 2, pp. 657-662, Apr. 2005.
14. W. Liu, H. Nishiyama, N. Ansari, and N. Kato, “A Study on Certificate Revocation in Mobile circumstantial Network,” Proc. IEEE Int’l Conf. Comm. (ICC), June 2011.
15. J. Clulow and T. Moore, “Suicide for the Common Good: A New Strategy for Credential Revocation in Self-organizing Systems,” ACMSIGOPS Operating Systems Rev., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 18-21, July 2006.
16. E. Rosen, D. Tappan, G. Fedorkow, Y. Rekhter, D. Farinacci, T. Li, and A. Conta Mpls label stack encoding , RFC 3032„ January 2008.
17. A. Gaeil and C. Woojik Design and implementation of mpls network simulator (mns) supporting qos , 15th International Conference on Information Networking„ January 2010.
18. A. Gaeil and C. Woojik, Design and implementation of mpls network simulator (mns) supporting ldp and cr-ldp, proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Networks (ICON 00), September 2011.
19. J. Kong, X. Hong, Y. Yi, J.-S. Park, J. Liu, and M.Gerla, “A Secure Ad-Hoc Routing Approach Using Localized Self- Healing Communities,” Proc. Sixth ACM Int’l Symp. Mobile Ad hoc Networking and Computing, pp. 254- 265. 2009.
20. Scalable Network Technologies Qualnet, http://www.scalablenetworks. Com, 2012.
21. C. Bettstetter, G. Resta, and P. Santi, “The Node Distribution of the Random Waypoint Mobility Model for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks,” IEEE Trans. Mobile Computing, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 257-269, July-Sept. 2008.
22. T. Camp, J. Boleng, and V. Davies, “A Survey of Mobility Models for Ad Hoc Network Research,” Wireless Comm. and Mobile Computing (WCMC) Special Issue on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking Research.[25] T.Panke,”Review of Certificate Revocation in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks, “International Journal of Advances in Management, Technology & Engineering Sciences, and ISSN: 2249-7455, vol.II, Issue 6(V), March 2013.