##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
In order to study the morphological characters of teak leaves and their influence on teak defoliator and skeletonizer, the study was conducted in the Laboratories of Biotechnology and Agricultural Chemistry of ASPEE College of Horticulture and Forestry, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, Gujarat during 2010 and 2011. Result revealed that average leaf length, width and area to the tune of 38.52 cm, 33.79 cm and 459.60 cm2, respectively. Leaf colour (dark green) in teak failed to influence leaf damage inflicted by teak defoliator and skeletonizer, significantly.
Key words: Teak, defoliator, skeletonizer, leaf, width, leaf area and leaf colour##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
How to Cite
Kabade, K. H., & Patel, Z. P. (2014). Morphological Charecter of Teak Leaves and Their Influence on Teak Defoliator and Skeletonizer. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Science and Technology, 1(10). Retrieved from https://igmpublication.org/ijetst.in/index.php/ijetst/article/view/453
References
1. Beeson, C. F. C. (1941). The ecology and control of the forest insects of india and the neighbouring countries. (1961 Reprint) New Delhi, Govt. of India, pp. 767.
2. Ghoghari, P. D. (2008). Studies on biology, chemical control and host plant resistance of Sorghum Shoot Fly, Atherigona soccata. Ph. D. Thesis submitted to NAU, Navsari.
3. Hanover, J. W. (1980). Breeding forest tree resistant to insects. Breeding Plants Resistant to Insects (Maxwell, F. G. and Jennings, P. R. eds.) John Willey, New York, pp. 487-511.
4. Hanumantha, M.; Gunaga, R. P. and Vasudeva, R. (2001). Variation for fruit parameters among teak (Tectona grandis Linn. F) clones. Journal of Tropical Forestry, 17(1): 59-63.
5. Kumar, S. (2006).Population dynamics and some manage aspects of mango hopper. Ph. D. Thesis submitted to NAU, Navsari.
6. Mathur, R. N. (1990). Pests of Teak and their control. Indian For. Res., 10 (3): 44-66.
7. Nair, K. S. S., (1988). The teak defoliator in Kerala, India (Alan A. Berryman Ed.) Dynamics of forest insect populations: Pattern, causes, implications: sujata publication house. pp. 268-289.
8. Nair, K. S. S., Sudheendrakumar, V. V., Verma, R. V. and Chacko, K. C. (1985). Tropical Forest Insect Pests : Ecology, Impact and Management. Cambridge University press. pp.312-340.
9. Prajapati, V. M. (2011). Morphological and biochemical variations of teak (Tectona grandis L.) clone in relation to resistance against leaf defoliator, Hyblaea puera Cramer and skeletonizer, Eutectona machaeralis Walker. Thesis submitted to Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari.
10. Senn, J.; Hanhimaki, S. and Haukioja, E. (1992). Among tree variation in leaf phenology and morphology and its correlation with insect performance in the Mountain birch. Oikos, 63: 215-222.
11. Tewari, D. N. (1992). A monograph on teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f) International Book Distributors 9/3, Rajpur Road, Dehra Dun (India) pp 214-215.
2. Ghoghari, P. D. (2008). Studies on biology, chemical control and host plant resistance of Sorghum Shoot Fly, Atherigona soccata. Ph. D. Thesis submitted to NAU, Navsari.
3. Hanover, J. W. (1980). Breeding forest tree resistant to insects. Breeding Plants Resistant to Insects (Maxwell, F. G. and Jennings, P. R. eds.) John Willey, New York, pp. 487-511.
4. Hanumantha, M.; Gunaga, R. P. and Vasudeva, R. (2001). Variation for fruit parameters among teak (Tectona grandis Linn. F) clones. Journal of Tropical Forestry, 17(1): 59-63.
5. Kumar, S. (2006).Population dynamics and some manage aspects of mango hopper. Ph. D. Thesis submitted to NAU, Navsari.
6. Mathur, R. N. (1990). Pests of Teak and their control. Indian For. Res., 10 (3): 44-66.
7. Nair, K. S. S., (1988). The teak defoliator in Kerala, India (Alan A. Berryman Ed.) Dynamics of forest insect populations: Pattern, causes, implications: sujata publication house. pp. 268-289.
8. Nair, K. S. S., Sudheendrakumar, V. V., Verma, R. V. and Chacko, K. C. (1985). Tropical Forest Insect Pests : Ecology, Impact and Management. Cambridge University press. pp.312-340.
9. Prajapati, V. M. (2011). Morphological and biochemical variations of teak (Tectona grandis L.) clone in relation to resistance against leaf defoliator, Hyblaea puera Cramer and skeletonizer, Eutectona machaeralis Walker. Thesis submitted to Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari.
10. Senn, J.; Hanhimaki, S. and Haukioja, E. (1992). Among tree variation in leaf phenology and morphology and its correlation with insect performance in the Mountain birch. Oikos, 63: 215-222.
11. Tewari, D. N. (1992). A monograph on teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f) International Book Distributors 9/3, Rajpur Road, Dehra Dun (India) pp 214-215.