Title: Hematological Parameters of Patients Suffering from Megaloblastic anemia and Aplastic anemia, Attending in Tertiary Care Hospital at Betiah, West Champaran, Bihar

Authors: Dr Sudhendra Nath Sinha, Dr U.S.Pandey, Dr A. Rai

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i1.16

Abstract

Objective: The present study was undertaken to evaluate the role of red cell indices in differentiation between macrocytosis of aplastic anemia and megaloblastic anemia.

Materials and Methods: A total of 36 patients each of bone marrow biopsy proven, megaloblastic anemia and aplastic anemia were included in the study. From all the patients of both the group’s CBC were done by fully automated, five part CBC machine supplied by Mindray. All the parameter was noted and comparative study were evaluated.

Results: It was observed that MCV was greater than 97 fl. in 14 cases of aplastic anemia (Mean MCV 106.8 fl) and 22 cases of megaloblastic anemia (mean MCV 111.82 fl). Hb, MCV, and MCHC were comparable in the two groups. However mean RDW (Red cell width) in megaloblastic anemia (mean 86.8 fl) was significantly higher than those in aplastic anemia (mean 70.4 fl). The difference in RDW of patients with megaloblastic anemia and aplastic anemia was statistically significant.

Conclusion: RDW can be of help to differentiate between the megaloblastic anemia and aplastic anemia.

Keywords: Mean corpuscular volume (MCV), Macrocytes, Red cell distribution width (RDW), MCHC, HB.

References

  1. Camel R. Pernicious Anemia. The expected findings of very low serum cobalamin levels, anemia and macrocytosis are often lacking. Arch Intern Med 1988; 148:1712-4.
  2. Bessman JD, Gilmer PR Jr., Gardner F H. Improved classification of anemias by MCV and RDW. Am J Clim Pathol 1983; 80:322-6.
  3. Brecher GF, Jackobek EF, Stohlinan FA et al. Size distribution of everythrocytes. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1962; 99:242-61.
  4. International Committee for Standardization in Haematology. Recommendations for the analysis of red cells, white cell and platelet size distribution curves: I. General principles. J Clin Pathol 1982; 35:1320-2.
  5. Morgan DL, Peck SD. The use of red cell distribution width in untreated pernicious anemia. Am J Clin Pathol 1988; 89:660-3.
  6. Saxena S, Weiner JM, Carmel R. Red blood cell distribution width in untreated pernicious anemia. Am J Clim Pathol 1988; 89:660-3.
  7. Roberts GT, El Badawi SB. Red blood cell distribution width index in some haematological disease. Am J Clim Pathol 1985; 83:222-6.
  8. Lee GR, Foerster J, Lukens J et al. Wintrobes' clinical hematologly. 10th Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins, 2000:14-5.
  9. Forsat C, David M, Harle J et al. New parameters in erythrocyte counting, value of histograms. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1987; 111:1150-4.
  10. Brittehan GM, Koepe JA. Red cell volume distributions and the diagnosis of anemia. Help or hindrance ? Arch Pathol Lab Med 1987; 111:1146-8.
  11. Lewis SM, Verwilghen RL. Dyserythropoiesis and dyserythropoietic anemias. Prog Haematol 1994; 8:99.

Corresponding Author

Dr Sudhendra Nath Sinha

Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Betiah, West Champaran