Details
Category: Volume 11 Issue 03 March 2023
Hits: 394

Title: Assessment of the Outcome of USG Guided Percutaneous Drainage of Liver Abscess with and Without Administration of Intra Cavitary Meropenem & Urokinase

Authors: Dr Jansi.S, Dr K. Gopinathan, Dr J. Devimeenal

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v11i3.08

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the outcome of USG guided pigtail drainage of liver abscess with administration of intra cavitary meropenem and urokinase. Urokinase by its fibrinolytic action and meropenem with its time dependent local action enhances drainage of liver abscess.

Materials and Methods

  • Pig tail (9 Fr/10Fr) inserted under USG guidance for all patients with liver abscess > 5 cm , pus to be drained from the liver abscess and sent for culture sensitivity.
  • Instillation of intracavitary urokinase depends on the size of the abscess (2500 IU / cm of abscess diameter ) on the 1st day , repeated at 8-hr intervals . Pigtail was clamped for 15 minutes and then unclamped.
  • On third day if the organisms in the pus shows culture sensitivity positive for meropenem, 500 mg of meropenem administered inside the abscess , repeated two more times after one and two weeks since the first administration.

Results: The outcome of study is assessed by percentage of decrease in size of liver abscess at day 3,5,7,10 and 15 and the duration of hospital stay . It was found that using analysis of variance, p value is 0.032,chi square value 27.979 statistically significant difference exists.

Conclusion: Patients treated with intra cavitary drugs meropenem and urokinase had shorter hospital stay (Day 7 (min)-Day 15(max). Control patients had longer hospital stay (>15 days). Combination of urokinase with meropenem shortens the hospital stay

Keywords: Liver Abscess, Meropenem & Urokinase.

References

  1. Julien Santi-Rocca, Marie-Christine Rigothier, Nancy Guillén Host-Microbe Interactions and Defense Mechanisms in the Development of Amoebic Liver Abscesses CLINICAL Microbiology Reviews, Jan. 2009, p. 65–75
  2. Karim Si-Tayeb,1 Fre´ de´ ric P. Lemaigre,2 and Stephen A. Duncan1 Organogenesis and Development of the Liver DOI 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.01.011
  3. Victoria Chernyak Montefiore Medical Center Kathryn J. Fowler UC San Diego Claude B. Sirlin UC San Diego Liver Anatomy LI-RADS® v2018 CT/MRI Manual
  4. Yoshihiro Sakamoto,a Norihiro Kokudo, a,*  Yoshikuni Kawaguchi, a and Keiichi Akitab Clinical Anatomy of the Liver: Review of the 19th Meeting of the Japanese Research Society of Clinical Anatomy Liver Cancer. 2017 Feb; 6(2): 146–160.
  5. Hossein Akhondi1; Durr E. Sabih2. Liver AbscessTreasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2019
  6. Matthew Chadwick , 1 Leonid Shamban , 2 and Michael Neumann2 Pyogenic Liver Abscess with No Predisposing Risk Factors hindawi .Received 3 July 2018; Accepted 19 August 2018; Published 4 September 2018 – risk factors
  7. Barbara Alkofer, 1 ,* Corentin Dufay, 1 Jean Jacques Parienti, 2 Vincent Lepennec, 3 Sylvie Dargere, 4 and Laurence Chiche Are Pyogenic Liver Abscesses Still a Surgical Concern? A Western Experience HPB Surg. 2012; 2012: 316013
  8. Sudhir R. Jayakar*, Prabhat B. Nichkaode Liver abscess, management strategies, and outcome Jayakar SR et al. IntSurg J. 2018 Sep;5(9):3093-310
  9. RJ Mendez, ML Schiebler, EK Outwater, HY KresselHepatic abscesses: MR imaging findings.- Radiology, 1994 - pubs.rsna.org
  10. Pablo Bächler, MD María José Baladron, MD Christine Menias, MD Ignacio Beddings, MD Ron Loch, MD Eugenio Zalaquett, MD Matías Vargas, MD Sarah Connolly, MD Sanjeev Bhalla, MD Álvaro Huete, MD Multimodality Imaging of Liver Infections: Differential Diagnosis and Potential PitfallsRadioGraphics 2016; 36:1001–1023
  11. Iván Pedrosa, Antonio Saíz, Juan Arrazola, Joaquín Ferreirós, César S. Pedrosa Hydatid Disease: Radiologic and Pathologic Features and Complications may 1 2000 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.20.3. g00ma06795
  12. Soon CheolBaek 1 , Jisun Lee 1 , * , Min Ho Kang 1 , * , Kyung Sik Yi 1 , Yook Kim 1 , Bum Sang Cho 1 , 2 , Kil sun Park 1 , 2 , Sang-Yong Eom 3 Features of Hepatic Abscesses on Computed Tomography: Predicting the Outcomes of Percutaneous Catheter Drainage or Needle Aspiration Iran J Radiol. 2017 ; 14(1):e13490
  13. Arshad Khan, Vijay Kumar Tekam* Liver abscess drainage by needle aspiration versus pigtail catheter: a prospective study International Surgery Journal Khan A et al. IntSurg J. 2018 Jan;5(1):62-68
  14. Yu-Long Cai, Xian-ZeXiong, Jiong Lu, Yao Cheng, Chen Yang, Yi-Xin Lin, Jie Zhang, and Nan-Sheng Cheng Percutaneous needle aspiration versus catheter drainage in the management of liver abscess: a systematic review and meta-analysis HPB (Oxford). 2015 Mar; 17(3): 195–201.
  15. Eastiak MF1, Saifullah M, Islam MS, Hossain MJ, Mannan M, Mousumi MS, Alam F, Sultana I, Debnath BC. Pigtail Catheter in the Management of Liver Abscess.Mymensingh Med J. 2015 Oct;24(4):770-5
  16. Enver Zerem1 and Amir Hadzic Sonographically Guided Percutaneous Catheter Drainage Versus Needle Aspiration in the Management of Pyogenic Liver Abscess AJR 2007; 189:W138–W142
  17. Jeong Min Lee, M.D., Mi Suk Lee, M.D., Jin Hee Lee, M.D. 2, Seong HeeYm, M.D. 2 Chong Soo Kim, M.D. 3, Young Min Han, M.D. 3 , Ki ChulChoi, M .D. Intracavitary Urokinase in the Treatment of Multiloculated Liver Abscess: A Case Report J Korean Radi이Soc 1997; 37: 31 7-320
  18. John R. Haaga Dean Nakamoto Thomas Stellato Ronald D. Novak Morris L. Gavant Stuart G. SilvermanMandell Bellmore Intracavitary Urokinase for Enhancement of Percutaneous Abscess Drainage: Phase II Trial AJR2000;174;1681–1685 0361–803X/00/1746–1681
  19. Miguelena Bobadilla JM1, de Gregorio Ariza MA, Medrano Peña J. Utility of urokinase in percutaneous drainage treatment of intra-abdominal abscesses Med Clin (Barc). 2009 Nov 7;133(17):662-4. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2009.05.018. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
  20. Gerardo Alvarez-Uria,1 Raghavakalyan Pakam,2 Manoranjan Midde,3 and Praveen Kumar Naik4 Intra-Abscess Administration of Antibiotics Through Ultrasound–Guided Percutaneous Catheter for the Treatment of Pyogenic Liver Abscess J ClinDiagn Res. 2013 Aug; 7(8): 1698–1699.
  21. Volgelzang RL, Tobin RS, Burstein S, Anschuetz SL, Marzan M, Kozlowski M. Transcatheterintracavitary fibrinolysis of infected extravascular hematoma. AJR 1987 ; 148: 378-380
  22. Lohora JM, Haaga JR, Stellato T, Flanigan T, Graham R. Safety of intracavitary urokinase with percutaneous abscess drainage. AJR 1993; 160: 171-174
  23. Park JK. Kraus FC, Haaga JR. Fluid flow during percutaneous drainage procedures: an in vitro study of the effects of fluid viscosity, catheter size, and adjunctive urokinase. AJR 1993; 160: 165-169
  24. Bouros D1, Schiza S, Tzanakis N, Chalkiadakis G, Drositis J, Intrapleuralurokinase versus normal saline in the treatment of complicated parapneumonic effusions and empyema. A randomized, double-blind study.Am J RespirCrit Care Med. 1999 Jan;159(1):37-42.
  25. Gerzof SG, Johnson WC, Robbins AH, Nabseth DC. Expanded cirteria for percutaneous abscess drainage.Arch Surg 1985; 120 227-232 2.
  26. Johnson RD, Mueller PR, Ferrucci JT Jr, et al. Percutaneous drainage of pyogenic liver absess. AJR 1985; 144: 463-467
  27. Oh JH, Yoon Y. Case repoπ of treatment of multiloculated liver abscess ’ administration of urokinase through drainage catheter Journal of the Korean Radiological Society 1995; 32: 479-481
  28. Lee KS, 1m JG, Kim YH, Hwang SH, Bae WK, Lee BH. Treatment of thoracic multiloculatedempyemas with intracavitaryurokinase: a prosepctive study. Radiology 1991; 179: 771-775
  29. Moulton JS, Moore PT, Mencini RA. Treatment of loculated pleural effusions with transcatheter intracavitary urokinase AJR 1989; 153: 941-945
  30. Yu X1, Liu R, Wang Y, Zhao H, Chen J, Zhang J, Hu CMedicine (Baltimore). 2017 May;96(21):e6359 May stereotactic intracavity administration of antibiotics shorten the course of systemic antibiotic therapy for brain abscesses?

Corresponding Author

Dr Jansi.S

Department of Radiology, Government Kilpauk Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu – 600010