Title: Lower Ureteric Calculus with ancillary Inverted Urothelial Papilloma – A Rare incidental Intra op Finding

Authors: Dr Venkat Arjunrao Gite, Dr Shashank Sharma, Dr Vivek Shaw

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v10i8.02

Abstract

Introduction

In the modern era, endourological procedures are the preferred treatment modalities for the management of urinary lithiasis Here we report a case of impacted lower ureteric calculus with ancillary Inverted Urothelial Papilloma of the lower ureteris an incidental finding. This space occupying lesion is encountered primarily in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. It is an extremely rare urinary tract ailment. It is seen in order of frequency in the bladder, urethra, and ureter. In this case report, we will present the clinical scenario, an incidental intra-operative finding, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up.

References

  1. Mertziotis, N., Kozyrakis, D., Petrolekas, A., Terzi, M. and Kapranos, N. (2012) 'Inverted papilloma of the ureter: study of a rare case with emphasis on clinicopathologic implications', Canadian Urological Association Journal, 6(6), E274, 
  2. Santi R, Galli IC, Canzonieri V, Lopez JI, Nesi G. Inverted urothelial papilloma of the upper urinary tract: description of two cases with systematic literature review. DiagnPathol. 2020 Apr 22;15(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13000-020-00961-9. PMID: 32321559; PMCID: PMC7175583.
  3. Sweeney Mary K. Soroush Rais-Bahrami, and Jennifer Gordetsky. "Inverted urothelial papilloma: a review of diagnostic pitfalls and clinical management. Canadian Urological Association Journal. 2017;11(1-2):66.
  4. Baarimah A, El Helaly A, Al Ghanbar M, Alotay A, Khodier F. Inverted urothelial papilloma: A rare pathology in young girl. A case report and literature review. Urol Case Rep. 2020 Dec 19;35:101543. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2020.101543. PMID: 33384936; PMCID: PMC7770532.
  5. Lotan Y, Roehrborn CG. Sensitivity and specificity of commonly available bladder tumor markers versus cytology: results of a comprehensive literature review and meta-analyses. Urology 2003;61:109–18.

Corresponding Author

Dr Shashank Sharma

GGMC and Sir JJH, Mumbai