Details
Category: Volume 10 Issue 07 July 2022
Hits: 486

Title: Diagnostic Accuracy of Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index to assess Hypovolemia in Critically ill Patients as compared to Central venous Pressure

Authors: Arsha Asok, Anil Sathyadas, Sobha S, Karthik V, Soumya Subramonian

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v10i7.13

Abstract

Hypovolemia related hemodynamic instability and its complications are common in critically ill patients. The traditional method of volume status estimation is central venous pressure (CVP), which is being replaced by inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVC-CI) as an easy, inexpensive and non-invasive alternative. The present study is intended to assess the diagnostic accuracy of IVC-CI in determining hypovolemic status in critically ill patients, as compared to CVP. A prospective, diagnostic accuracy assessment study was conducted in 106 critically ill patients and CVP measurements were done from a central venous catheter. Bedside sonography was done to measure the anteroposterior diameter of inferior vena cava (IVCD) at end-inspiration and end-expiration. The formula [(maximum IVCD–minimum IVCD)/ maximum IVCD] x100 was used to calculate IVC-CI. Statistical software SPSS 24.0 was used for analysis and determination of the validity of the test. Of the 106 patients studied, 72 had spontaneous breathing. 46.2% patients had a low CVP value of < 8 cm H2O. The values of inspiratory and expiratory IVC diameters, and IVC-CI were found to be statistically significant in both the spontaneous and the mechanically ventilated groups. In the spontaneous group, an IVC-CI > 34.8% (sensitivity 76.5%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 82.6% and accuracy 88.9%) and in mechanically ventilated patients, IVC-CI > 52.1% (sensitivity 93.3%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 95% and an accuracy 97.1%) were obtained as cut-offs. IVC-CI is well validated in determining hypovolemia in critically ill patients.

Keywords: central venous pressure; inferior vena cava collapsibility index; hypovolemia; spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated patients.

References

  1. Boyd JH, Forbes J, Nakada TA, Walley KR, Russell JA: Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: a positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are
    associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med. 2011, 39:259-65. 1097/CCM.0b013e3181feeb15.
  2. McIntyre LA, Hébert PC, Fergusson D, Cook DJ, Aziz A, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group: A survey of Canadian intensivists’ resuscitation practices in early septic shock. Crit Care. 2007, 11:R74. 10.1186/cc5962.
  3. Stawicki SP, Braslow BM, Panebianco NL, Kirkpatrick JN, Gracias VH, Hayden GE, Dean AJ: Intensivist use of hand-carried ultrasonography to measure IVC collapsibility in estimating intravascular volume status, correlations with CVP. J Am Coll Surg. 2009, 209:55-61.10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.02.062.
  4. Eisen LA, Narasimhan M, Berger JS, Mayo PH, Rosen MJ, Schneider RF: Mechanical complications of central venous catheters. J Intensive Care Med.2006, 21:40-6. 10.1177/0885066605280884.
  5. Bennett A, Aya D, Cecconi M: Evaluation of cardiac function using heartlung interactions. Ann Transl Med. 2018, 6(18):356.
  6. Kastrup M, Markewitz A, Spies C, Carl M, Erb J, Grosse J, Schirmer U: Current practice of hemodynamic monitoring and vasopressor and inotropic therapy in post-operative cardiac surgery patients in Germany: results from a postal survey. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007, 51:347-58. 10.1111/j.1399-2006.01190.x.
  7. Marik PE, Flemmer M, Harrison W: The risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with femoral venous catheters as compared to subclavian and internal jugular venous catheters: a systematic review of the literature and metaanalysis. Crit Care Med. 2012, 40:2479-85. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318255d9bc.
  8. Nagdev AD, Merchant RC, Tirado-Gonzalez A, Sisson CA, Murphy MC: Emergency department bedside ultrasonographic measurement of the caval index for noninvasive determination of low central venous pressure. Ann Emerg 2010, 55:290-5. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.04.021.
  9. Fields JM, Lee PA, Jenq KY, Mark DG, Panebianco NL, Dean AJ: The interrater reliability of inferior vena cava ultrasound by bedside clinician sonographers in emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2011, 18:98-101. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00952.x.
  10. Sobczyk D, Nycz K, Andruszkiewicz P, Wierzbicki K, Stapor M: Ultrasonographic caval indices do not significantly contribute to predicting fluid responsiveness immediately after coronary artery bypass grafting when compared to passive leg raising. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2016, 14:23.10.1186/s12947-016-0065-4.
  11. Thanakitcharu P, Charoenwut M, Siriwiwatanakul N: Inferior vena cava diameter and collapsibility index: a practical non-invasive evaluation of intravascular fluid volume in critically-ill patients. J Med Assoc Thai. 2013, 96:S14-22.
  12. Yavaşi Ö, Ünlüer EE, Kayayurt K, Ekinci S, Sağlam C, Sürüm N, Köseoğlu MH, Yeşil M: Monitoring the response to treatment of acute heart failure patients by ultrasonographic inferior vena cava collapsibility index. Am J Emerg Med. 2014, 32:403-7. 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.12.046.
  13. Citilcioglu S, Sebe A, Oguzhan Ay M, Icme F, Avci ., Gulen M, et al. The relationship between inferior vena cava diameter measured by bedside ultrasonography and central venous pressure value. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;30(2):310–5.
  14. Taniguchi T, Ohtani T, Nakatani S, Hayashi K, Yamaguchi O, Komuro I, et al. Impact of Body Size on Inferior Vena Cava Parameters for Estimating Right Atrial Pressure: A Need for Standardization? J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Dec;28(12):1420–7.
  15. Kircher BJ, Himelman RB, Schiller NB. Noninvasive estimation of right atrial pressure from the inspiratory collapse of the inferior vena cava. Am J Cardiol 1990; 66:493–496.
  16. Brennan JM, Blair JE, Goonewardena S, et al. Reappraisal of the use of inferior vena cava for estimating right atrial pressure. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007; 20:857–861. J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31:1885–1890 1889.
  17. Charron C, Caille V, Jardin F, Vieillard-Baron A. Echocardiographic measurement of fluid responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2006;12(3):249–254.
  18. Via G, Tavazzi G, Price S. Ten situations where inferior vena cava ultrasoundmay fail to accurately predict fluid responsiveness: a physiologically based point of view. Intensive Care Med 2016;42(7):1164–1167.

Corresponding Author

Dr Arsha Asok MD DNB

Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram