Details
Category: Volume 10 Issue 01 January 2022
Hits: 540

Title: Determinants of Publication Pressure and Motivations and Barriers to Publishing among Biomedical Faculty Members

Authors: Dr Saeed Mohammed Al-Qahtani, Bayan S Alqahtany, Razan A Al Ghassab

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v10i1.20

Abstract

Objective: To assess the extent and explore the determinants of publication pressure among faculty members in health sciences colleges
Methods: A cross-sectional study involved 84 faculty members including colleges of medicine, dentistry, pharmacy, nursing, public health and health informatics, science and health professions and applied medical sciences. The Publication Pressure Questionnaire (PPQ-14 items) was used with a calculation of 0-100 scaled PPQ score (PPQS). High publication pressure was defined as PPQS score >50 (75th centile) of the study population. Barriers to publication were assessed using a 10-item scale with calculation of a barrier to publication score (BPS, range=0-40). Stepwise linear regression and binary logistic regression models were used to analyze the independent factors for PPQS and high publication pressure, respectively.
Results: The mean (SD) PPQS score was 41.56 (12.46). The prevalence of high publication pressure was 27.4% (95%CI=18.2%-38.2%). Both PPQS and high publication pressure were independently associated with BPS, as demonstrated in stepwise linear (B=0.56; 95%CI=0.15, 0.98; p=0.008) and binary logistic (OR=1.28; 95% CI=1.04, 1.56; p=0.018) regression models, respectively. PPQS was also independently associated with the number of publications in an inversed relationship (B=-3.78; 95% CI=-5.59, -1.96; p<0.001). Having “career progression”, “financial incentives”, or “awards and prestige” as the first motive for publication was independently associated with PPQS (B=6.73; 95% CI=0.97, 12.48; p=0.0.23). Affiliation to medicine, applied medical sciences, nursing or science & health professions college was independently associated with high publication pressure (OR=25.89; 95% CI =1.18, 569.58; p=0.039).
Conclusion: More than a quarter of medical faculty members experience high levels of publication pressure, which is associated with several obstacles to publications and career and financial expectations. Supportive measures should be implemented to enhance research productivity and facilitate the publishing process in the medical academia.
Keywords: Publication pressure, questionnaire, faculty, research, research and publication, scientific publication, academic position, faculty, publication pressure.

References

  1. Saud AlEnazi A, Alamri AS, AlGhamdi AS, et al. Perceptions, barriers, and attitudes toward research among in-training physicians in Saudi Arabia: A multicenter survey. Sci Prog. 2021;104:368504211010604. 10.1177/00368504211010604
  2. Chen S, Pan Y, Yao Q, Yao L, Liu Z, Xiang L. Publication pressure on Chinese doctors--another view. Lancet. 2014;384:956.10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61630-5
  3. Duvivier R, Crocker-Buqué T, Stull MJ. Young doctors and the pressure of publication. Lancet. 2013; 381:e10.10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60932-0
  4. Bechtold JE, Williams BR, Weinstein SL, et al. The pursuit of scholarship: why we should care about resident research. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99:e119.10.2106/JBJS.16.01502
  5. Al-Mohrej OA, Alsadoun NF, Alshaalan FN, Alturki RI, Al-Rabiah AM, Hamdi NB, et al. Research activities and critical appraisal skills among Saudi orthopedic residents. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21:311. 10.1186/s12909-021-02772-y
  6. Laker C, Cella M, Callard F, Wykes T. The impact of ward climate on staff perceptions of barriers to research-driven service changes on mental health wards: A cross-sectional study. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020;27:281–95.10.1111/jpm.12577
  7. Singh C, Jackson D, Munro I, Cross W. Work experiences of Nurse Academics: A qualitative study. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;106:105038. 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105038
  8. Haven TL, Goede MEE de, Tijdink JK, Oort FJ. Personally perceived publication pressure: revising the Publication Pressure Questionnaire (PPQ) by using work stress models. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019;4:7.10.1186/s41073-019-0066-6
  9. Anderson MS, Ronning EA, De Vries R, Martinson BC. The perverse effects of competition on scientists’ work and relationships. Sci Eng Ethics. 2007;13:437–61.10.1007/s11948-007-9042-5
  10. Haven TL, Bouter LM, Smulders YM, Tijdink JK. Perceived publication pressure in Amsterdam: Survey of all disciplinary fields and academic ranks. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0217931.10.1371/journal.pone.0217931.
  11. Park B, Sohn E, Kim S. Does the pressure to fill journal quotas bias evaluation?: Evidence from publication delays and rejection rates. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0236927.10.1371/journal.pone.0236927
  12. Tijdink JK, Vergouwen AC, Smulders YM. Publication pressure and burn out among Dutch medical professors: A nationwide survey. PloS one. 2013;8(9):e73381.10.1371/journal.pone.0236927
  13. Fanelli D, Costas R, Larivière V. Misconduct policies, academic culture and career stage, not gender or pressures to publish, affect scientific integrity. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0127556.10.1371/journal.pone.0127556
  14. Levecque K, Anseel F, De Beuckelaer A, Van der Heyden J, Gisle L. Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students. Research Policy. 2017;46:868–79.10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008
  15. Mittwede PN, Morales-Restrepo A, Fourman MS, et al. Research-track residency programs in orthopaedic surgery: asurvey of program directors and recent graduates. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101:1420-7.10.2106/JBJS.18.00472
  16. Alsuhaibani M, Alharbi A, Inam SNB, Alamro A, Saqr M. Research education in an undergraduate curriculum: Students perspective. Int J Health Sci. 2019;13:30. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC6436448/
  17. Abdo A, Bodrick M. The commission in 2020: A transformation journey worth taking! Journal of Health Specialties. 2017;5:127-128.https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-commission-in-2020%3A-A-transformation-journey-Abdo-Bodrick/74cc4988f9ed5b37ee56ec0f0eab2f1e1d2244cd
  18. Al-Mutairi KA, Al-Shami SA. Scientific research in Saudi universities: science thrives in the desert. GJBAHS. 2015;4:6. https://www.longdom.org/articles/scientific-research-in-saudi-universities-science-thrives-in-the-desert.pdf
  19. International Science Ranking. SJR - International Science Ranking. (2021) accessed: October 29, 2021: https://www.scimagojr.com/countryrank.php?area=2700
  20. Al-Abdullateef SH. A survey of the attitude and practice of research among doctors in Riyadh military hospital primary care centers, Saudi Arabia. J Family Community Med. 2012;19:38–42. 10.4103/2230-8229.94012
  21. Tijdink JK, Smulders YM, Vergouwen ACM, de Vet HCW, Knol DL. The assessment of publication pressure in medical science; validity and reliability of a Publication Pressure Questionnaire (PPQ). Qual Life Res. 2014;23:2055–62.10.1007/s11136-014-0643-6
  22. Clark KR, Jackowski MB. Medical imaging and radiation therapy professionals’ perceptions of publishing in academic journals. Radiol Technol. 2020;91:333–41. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32102861/
  23. Clark KR, Webster TL. Scholarly productivity among educators in radiologic sciences and other health care professions: a comparative approach. Radiol Technol. 2020;92:113–25. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33203768/
  24. Srinivasan MR, Poorni S, Sujatha G, Kumar SN. Research experiences, attitudes, and barriers to publishing among the dental postgraduate teachers: a cross-sectional study. Indian J Dent Res. 2014;25:454–8.10.4103/0970-9290.142529
  25. Darawad MW, Alhussami M, Sa’aleek MA, Al Ateeq E, Samarkandi OA, Al-Anati A. Nursing faculty members’ attitudes and perceived barriers toward conducting scientific research: A descriptive study from Saudi Arabia. Int J Caring Sci. 2018;11:1192–203. http://www.internationaljournalofcaringsciences.org/docs/63._1-1-darawad_original10_2.pdf
  26. Alghanim SA, Alhamali RM. Research productivity among faculty members at medical and health schools in Saudi Arabia. Prevalence, obstacles, and associated factors. Saudi Med J. 2011;32:1297–303.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22159387/
  27. Lesi OA, Orenuga OO, Roberts A, Abudu OO. Research productivity of junior academic staff at a tertiary medical college in south west, Nigeria. Nig Q J Hosp Med. 2009;19:119–24.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20836313/
  28. Dakik HA, Kaidbey H, Sabra R. Research productivity of the medical faculty at the American University of Beirut. Postgrad Med J. 2006;82:462–4.10.1136/pgmj.2005.042713
  29. Mills D, Inouye K. Problematizing ‘predatory publishing’: A systematic review of factors shaping publishing motives, decisions, and experiences. Learned Publishing. 2021;34:89–104.10.1002/leap.1325
  30. Demir SB. Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? Journal of Informetrics. 2018;12:1296–311.10.1016/j.joi.2018.10.008.

Corresponding Author

Dr Saeed Mohammed Al-Qahtani

Assistant Professor, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS)