Title: Significance of Frozen Section and Squash Cytology in Diagnosing C.N.S. Lesions and It’s Histopathological Correlation

Authors: Ambrish Kumar, Jini L Valooran, Khethmal P

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v10i1.04

Abstract

Introduction: Intraoperative evaluation of lesions in central nervous system requires the correlation of clinical, radiological and histologic data and knowledge of clinicopathological entities and their common locations. The rapid diagnostic evaluation at Frozen Section may guide intraoperative management, which may be particularly important during open craniotomy. In addition, Frozen section allows for the appropriate triage of tissue for ancillary studies such as electron microscopy, microbiologic cultures, and frozen tissue storage. Intraoperatve consultations have become increasingly common in suspected cases of central nervous system. neoplasms. The study is designed to assess the accuracy of squash cytology and frozen section in diagnosing the CNS lesions on intra-operative biopsies in comparison to the gold standard paraffin embedded histopathological sections report of post operative specimens.

Methods: Diagnostic test evaluation. All the cases received from neurosurgery department for intraoperative diagnosis.

Results:  Frozen section shows significant correlation with histopathology in CNS lesions

Conclusions: The role of Frozen Section in the intraoperative consultation is important. Our results show a high percentage of accuracy in the intraoperative diagnosis of CNS lesions.

Keywords: FS- Frozen section, SC- Squash cytology.

References

  1. Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N, Aster JA. Robbins & Cotran Pathologic basis of disease 7th ed. Philadeiphia: Elsevier, 2004.
  2. Greig NH, Ries LG, Yancik R, Rapoport SI. Increasing annual incidence of primary malignant brain tumours in elderly. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990;82(20):1621-4.
  3. Silverberg SG, Delellis RA, Frabe WJ. Principles and practice of Surgical pathology and cytopathology. 3rd edn. New York: Churchil Livingstone. 1997.
  4. Yachnis AT. Intraoperative consultation for nervous system lesions.SeminDiagn Pathol.2002;19(4):192–206.
  5. Firlik KS, Martinez AJ, Lunsord LD. Use of cytological preparations for the intraoperative diagnosis of stereotactically obtained brain biopsies: a 19 year experience and survey of neuropatho-logists. J Neurosurg. 1999;91:454–458.
  6. Burger PC, Nelson JS. Stereotactic brain biopsies: specimen preparation and evaluation. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997;121:477–480.
  7. Folkerth RD. Smears and frozen sections in the intraoperative diagnosis of central nervous system lesions. Neurosurg Clin North Am. 1994;5:1–18.
  8. Plesec TP, Prayson RA. Frozen section discrepancy in the evaluation of central nervous system tumors. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007; 131:1532-40.
  9. Savargaonkar P, Farmer PM. Utility of intra-operative consultations for the diagnosis of central nervous system lesions. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2001; 31:133-9.
  10. Roessler K, Dietrich W, Kitz K. High diagnostic accuracy of cytologic smears of central nervous system tumors. A 15-year experience based on 4,172 patients. Acta Cytol 2002; 46:667-74.
  11. Ud Din N, Memon A, Idress R, Ahmad Z, Hasan S. Central Nervous System Lesions: Correlation of Intraoperative and Final Diagnoses, Six Year Experience at a Referral Centre in a Developing Country, Pakistan. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2011; 12:1435-7.
  12. Suh YL, Koo H, Kim TS, Chi JG, Park SH, Khang SK, et, al. Tumors of the central nervous system in Korea: a multicenter study of 3221 cases. J Neurooncol. 2002;56(3):251-9.

Corresponding Author

Khethmal P