Title: A Comparative Study of Conventional Tonsillectomy versus Coblation Tonsillectomy

Authors: Dr A. Balakrishnan, Dr T. Ramanathan, Dr P. Ramasundar, Dr A. Mathanraj

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v9i10.05

Abstract

Aim: To compare and study the advantages of conventional (Dissection and snare method) Tonsillectomy versus coblational tonsillectomy with regards to Intraoperative time, Intraoperative blood loss, Post-operative pain and early return to normalcy.

Objective: Prospective study to systemically analyze the advantages of conventional (Dissection and snare method) Tonsillectomy versus coblation tonsillectomy with regards to intraoperative time, intraoperative blood Loss and Post-operative pain and outcomes.

Study Design: It is a prospective cohort study analyzing 50 patients who were divided into 2 groups each group comprising of 25 patients. Group-I were analysed with regards to conventional tonsillectomy with group-II who underwent coblational tonsillectomy based on peroperative bleeding, per operative time, postoperative pain, and return to normalcy. Every patients were tested on basic blood investigations including complete blood count, renal function test, bleeding time, clotting time, urine routine, X-ray soft tissue skull, Diagnostic nasal endoscopy to rule out adenoids, HIV, VDRL  and With prior preoperative anesthetic assessment. Every patient on the day of operation was given preoperative antibiotics and underwent surgery under General anesthesia. On the table per operative time and amount of bleeding were noted. Postoperatively all patients were put under IV antibiotics on 1st day and oral antibiotics from next day for subsequent 3 days. Postoperative pain (visual analogue scale), early diet intake and return to normalcy were recorded into statistical data.

Conclusion: Cost effectiveness, surgical skills and microscopical settings were three main disadvantages with the coblation method. Coblation method was found to be superior to conventional method using systemic criteria based on this prospective analysis.

Keywords: Tonsillectomy, Coblational tonsillectomy, Radiofrequency.

References

  1. Silvola J, Salonen A, Nieminen J, Kokki H. Tissue welding tonsillectomy provides an enhanced recovery compared to that after monopolar electrocautery technique in adults: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011; 268(2):255-260.
  2. Lee KC, Bent JP, III, Dolitsky JN, Hinchcliffe AM, Mansfield EL, White AK. Surgical advances in tonsillectomy: report of a roundtable discussion. Ear Nose Throat. 2004; 83(8):4-13.
  3. Sezen OS, Kaytanci H, Kubilay U. Comparison between tonsillectomy with thermal welding and the conventional 'cold' tonsillectomy technique. ANZ J Surg. 2008; 78(11):1014-1018.
  4. Divi V, Benninger M. Postoperative tonsillectomy bleed: coblation versus noncoblation. Laryngoscope. 2005; 115(1):31-33.
  5. Stavroulaki Pelagia, Charalampos Skoulakis, Evangelos Theos, Nikolaos Kokalis, Dimitrios Valagianis. Thermal Welding versus Cold Dissection Tonsillectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blind Study in Adult Patients. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. 2007; 116(8):565-570.

Corresponding Author

Dr A. Balakrishnan, MS., DLO.

Assistant Professor, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Government Theni Medical College, Theni, Tamilnadu, India