Title: Patterns of Microcalcification in Mammography Done In Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions

Authors: Dr Deepa S, Dr Beenamol S, Dr Divya. S.

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v8i12.17

Abstract

Introduction:  Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in India. The incidence of breast cancer is on its rise.

Materials and Methods: A descriptive study was conducted among 75 female patients above 20 years of age with palpable breast lesions. Patients with advanced carcinoma, patients with history of previous breast biopsy and previously treated cases were excluded from the study.

Results: Twenty three subjects had microcalcifications and twenty seven with macrocalcifications.

Conclusion: This study shows that certain findings in mammography can differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions

Keywords: Benign, breast, mammography, microcalcifications.

References

  1. Bellahcene A, Castronovo V. Increased expression of osteonectin and osteopontin, two bone matrix proteins, in human breast cancer. Am J Pathol. 1995;146(1):95–100.
  2. Nalawade YV. Evaluation of breast calcifications. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2009;19(4):282–6.
  3. Bansal GJ, Thomas KG. Screen-detected breast cancer: does presence of minimal signs on prior mammograms predict staging or grading of cancer? Clin Radiol. 2011;66(7):605–8.
  4. Castronovo V, Bellahcene A. Evidence that breast cancer associated microcalcifications are mineralized malignant cells. Int J Oncol. 1998;12 (2):305–8.
  5. Zunzunegui RG, Chung MA, Oruwari J, Golding D, Marchant DJ, Cady B. Casting-type calcifications with invasion and high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ: a more aggressive disease? Arch Surg. 2003;138(5):537–40.
  6. Palka I, Ormandi K, Gaal S, Boda K, Kahan Z. Casting-type calcifications on the mammogram suggest a higher probability of early relapse and death among high-risk breast cancer patients. Acta Oncol. 2007;46(8):1178–83.
  7. The Swedish Organised Service Screening Evaluation Group: Reduction in breast cancer mortality from organized service screening with mammography: 1. Further confirmation with extended data. Cancer Epidemiol Biomakers Prev. 2006, 15:45-51. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05- 0349
  8. Weir HK, Thun MJ, Hankey BF, et al.: Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2000, featuring the uses of surveillance data for cancer prevention and control. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003, 3:1276-1299. 10.1093/jnci/djg040
  9. Tabar L, Dean BP: Thirty years of experience with mammography screening: a new approach 2019 Hadi et al. Cureus 11(10): e5919. DOI 10.7759/cureus.5919 10 of 11 to the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2008, 10:3. 10.1186/bcr2163
  1. Shin HJ, Kim HH, Kim SM, Kwon GY, Gong G, Cho OK: Screening-detected and symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the sonographic and pathologic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008, 190:516-525. 10.2214/AJR.07.2206
  2. Fischer U, Baun F, Obenauer S, Luftner-Nagel S, von Heyden D, Vosshenrich R, Grabbe E: Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs. screen-film mammography. Eur Radiol. 2002, 12:2679-2683.
  3. Sickles EA, D’Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, et al.: ACR BI-RADS® Mammography. ACR BI-RADS®Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, USA; 2013. 5:
  4. Uematsu T, Kasami M, Yuen S: Usefulness and limitations of Japan mammography guidelines for the categorization of breast microcalcifications. Breast Cancer. 2008, 15:291-297. 10.1007/s12282-008-0033-4
  5. Jerrold T. Bushberg JAS, Edwin M. Leidholdt Jr, John M. Boone. The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging. 2009.
  6. Craft M, Bicknell AM, Hazan GJ, Flegg KM. Microcalcifications Detected as an Abnormality on Screening Mammography: Outcomes and Follow up over a Five-Year Period. Int J Breast Cancer.2013:458540
  7. Cao MM, Hoyt AC, Bassett LW. Mammographic signs of systemic disease. Radiographics. Jul-Aug;31(4):1085-100.
  8. Haus AG, Metz CE, Chiles JT, Rossmann K. The effect of x-ray spectra from molybdenum and tungsten target tubes on image quality in mammography. Radiology. 1976 Mar;118(3):705-9.
  9. Sickles EA. Breast calcifications: mammographic evaluation. Radiology. 1986 Aug;160(2):289-93.

Corresponding Author

Dr Divya. S.

Specialist in Community Medicine, ESI Vadavathoor, Kottayam, India