Title: Small Incision Cataract Surgery (A Safe, Cheap and Affordable Alternative to Phacoemulsification) (Let’s make it popular)

Authors: Samar H Shoeir, FICO, MRCS Ed, MSc, Sanaa A Mohamed, MD, MSc, Doaa A Hussien FICO, MRCSEd

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v8i6.84

Abstract

Purpose: To study the effectiveness and adverse events associated with the surgical treatment of cataracts; focusing on SICS as treatment option to make recommendations on the most suitable treatment option for cataract in outreach.

Settings:  Senoris general hospital (Al Fayoum city).

Design: This prospective cross-sectional study.

Methods: This study enrolled patients who underwent MSICS between April 2018 to April 14 2019. The primary outcome measure was post-operative, pinhole corrected VA on day 1 and 4 weeks. The secondary outcomes were complications as well as the costs of surgery.

Results: A total number of 120 patients, 45 of them were males (37.5%), mean age of 62.0917± 9.7 years underwent MSICS. On post-operative day one, 70 eyes (58.3%) had good visual acuity (6/6 to 6/18), 50 eyes (41.6 %) borderline (<6/18 to 6/60) and 0 (0 %) had poor outcome less than 6/60.

At 4 weeks postoperatively 120 eyes had good vision.

Among all operated eyes, 32 eyes (26.6%) had intra-operative complications. The most common intra-operative complication was premature entry in 8 eyes (6.7 %). The frequent complication during the immediate postoperative period was corneal edema (34.1%). It was resolved within 2 weeks with good VA.

The total surgical costs per case were estimated at (400 LE) ($25).

Conclusion: Manual SICS is significantly faster and less technology-dependent than phacoemulsification, it may be a more appropriate cataract surgery in outreach.

Keywords:  Cataract, Manual small incision cataract surgery.

References

  1. LuiB, XuL, Ya Xing W, and Jonas JB. Prevalence of Cataract Surgery and Postoperative Visual Outcome in Greater Beijing: The Beijing Eye Study. American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2009. Doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.
  2. YorstonD, Gichuhi S, Wood M, and Foster A. Does prospective monitoring improves cataract surgery outcome in Africa? British Journal of Ophthalmology.2002; 86:543-547.
  3. Komolafe OO, Ashaye AO, Ajayi BGK and Bekibele CO. Visual Impairment from Age-Related.
  4. Cataract among an Indigenous African Population. Eye.2010; 24:53-58.
  5. Tabin G, Chen M, and Espandar L. Cataract surgery for the developing world. Current Opinionin Ophthalmology, 2008; 19:55-59.
  6. J. Intraocular Lenses. Department of Ophthalmology. University of Arizona, Arizona. Available from: http://www.mhprofessional.com/handbookofoptics/pdf/Handbook_of_Optics_vol3_ch2 1.pdf [Accessed02March2012].
  7. Malik PK, Keshri PK, Pathak A, Yadhuvanshi HK, and Kapoor P. Cataract Blindness in Developing Countries-Procedure of choice for a Large Population, Asian Journal of Ophthalmology.2002;4(1):9-11.
  8. Gogate P. Comparison of various techniques for cataract surgery, their efficacy, safety and cost. Oman Journal of Ophthalmology.2010; 3(3):105-106.
  9. Health Care. Phacoemulsification. Available from: http://health.indiamart.com/eyecare [Accessedon22August 2011].
  10. Venkatesh R, Tan SH Colin, Sengupta S, Ravindran RD, Krishnan KT, and Chang DF. Phacoemulsification versus manual small-incision cataract surgery for white cataract. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.2010; 36:1849-1854.
  11. Hennig A, Kumar J, Yorston D and Foster A. Sutureless cataract surgery with nucleus extraction: Outcome of a prospective study in Nepal. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87:266-270.
  12. Laxmi Devi Manandhar1, Salma KC Rai2, Kabindra Bajracharya3, Ram Prasad Kandel4, Prasanna Sharma5, Ken Bassett6-Asian Journal of Medical Sciences | Jul-Aug 2018 | Vol 9 | Issue 4.
  13. Zia S, Raza, and Syed IA. Comparison of Small Incision Cataract Surgery with Extra Capsular Cataract Extraction. Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College (JRMC). 2010;14(2):84-86.
  14. Gogate P and Kulkarni AN. Comparison of Cataract Surgery in a Base Hospital and in Peripheral Eye Camps. Community Eye Health 2002; 15:26–27.
  15. Khan MT, Jan S, Hussain Z, Karim S, Khalid MK and Mohammad L. Visual Outcome and Complications of Manual Sutureless Small Incision Cataract Surgery. Pak J Ophthalmol 2010;26:32-38
  16. Limbu B and Jha HC. Intraoperative Complications of High Volume Sutureless Cataract Surgery in Nepal: A Prospective Study. Kathmandu Univ Med J 2014; 47:194-197.
  17. Hosamani S, Vallabha K and Warad V. Post-operative complications and visual outcome in eye camp patients undergoing sutureless cataract surgery at a Base Hospital in Vijayapura District, South India. Niger J Ophthalmol 2015; 23:16-21.
  18. Shrestha JK, Pradhan YM and Snellingen T. Outcomes of extracapsular surgery in eye camps of eastern Nepal. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85:648-652.
  19. Boughton B. Phacoand ECCE: Comparing the Costs and Benefits, EYENET: 2009; 43-47.

Corresponding Author

Samar H Shoeir, FICO, MRCS Ed, MSc

Cataract and Glaucoma Specialist, Al Fayoum Ophthalmology Hospital