Title: Clinical Outcome of Vacuum Assisted Closure Device in Healing of Complex Orthopaedic Wounds

Authors: Dr Mac Antony Michael, Dr Jagajeev. JR, Dr Sabarisree M

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v8i6.33

Abstract

Background: Vacuum assisted wound healing is a recent innovation and proven technique that results   in faster and better healing of wounds based on the application of negative suction pressure.

Objectives: To determine the clinical outcome of vacuum assisted closure device in healing of complex orthopedic wounds.

Methods: In this case series ,a prospective longitudinal study  was conducted on 56 patients with complex orthopedic wounds by negative pressure therapy in the form of vacuum assisted closure using low resources

Results: Evaluation done based on the changes in the wound surface areas and wound bed scores with each round of application of vacuum assisted closure device (maximum of 3).Reduction in wound surface area was 11.5% at the end of the treatment with p=0.000.Wound scoring on an average 68.4%at the end of treatment with VAC device with P=0.000.

Conclusion: Vacuum assisted closure device significantly and effectively improves wound healing and is especially useful in low resource setting.

References

  1. Argenta LC, Morykwas MJ. Vacuum- assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience. Annals of plastic surgery. 1997 Jun 1:38(6);563-77
  2. Mahandaru D, Seswandhana R. The simplest Modified Vacuum Assisted Closure to Treat Chronic Wound: Serial Case report. Jurnal Plastik Rekonstruksi
  3. Morykwas MJ. Faler BJ. Pearce DJ, Argenta LC. Effects of varying levels of subatmospheric pressure on the the rate of granulation tissue  formation in experimental wound in swine. Annals of plastic surgery .2001 Nov1:47(5):  547-51
  4. Weed T, Ratliff C, Drake DB. Quantifying bacterial bioburden during negative pressure wound therapy: does the wound VAC enhance bacterial clearance ? Annals of plastic surgery. 2004 Mar 1:52 (3):276-9
  5. Wackenfors A. Gustafsson R, Sjogren J, Algotsson L,Ingemansson R, Malmsjo M. Blood flow responses in peristernal thoracic wall during vacuum-assisted closure therapy. The Annals of thoracic surgery 2005 May 31:79(5):1724-30.
  6. Timmers MS, Le Cessie S, Banwell P, Jukema GN. The effect of varying degrees of pressure delivered by negative- pressure wound therapy on skin perfusion. Annal of plastic surgery.2005 Dec 1:55 (6):665-71.
  7. Kumar P. Exploiting potency of negative pressure in wound dressing using limited access dressing and suction-assisted dressing. Indian journal of plastic surgery: official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. 2012 May: 45(2);302
  8. Orgill DP, Manders EK, Sumpio BE, Lee RC, Attinger CE, Gurtner GC, Ehrlich HP. The mechanisms of action of vacuum- assisted closure: more to learn. Surgery.2009 Jul31:146(1):40-51
  9. Borgquist O, Ingemansson R. Malmsjo M. The influence of low and high pressure level during negative pressure wound therapy on wound contraction and fluid evacuation. Plastic and reconstructive surgery.2011 Feb 1:127(2):551-9.
  10. Mendez-Eastman S.Guidelines for using negative pressure wound therapy. Advances in skin &wound care. 2001 Nov1:14(6): 314-23.

Corresponding Author

Dr Jagajeev. JR

Addl. Professor, Dept.of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, India