Title: Urine Analysis for Abnormal Urine in Pathology Laboratory
Authors: Sonu Rawat, Purti Agrawal, Rakesh Singh Hazari, Bindu Singh Gaur, Rinku Bhagora, Harshul Patidar, Priya Kapoor
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v8i6.08
Abstract
Aims and Objective: Urinalysis is routine screening tests and diagnostic tool for identification of infections and diseases. The objective is to the evaluation of the frequency of abnormal urine and use of tests for confirming the provisional clinical diagnosis.
Material and Methods: This prospective study was conducted in pathology laboratory of district hospital associated with government medical college, Khandwa during 4-months period between 1 April 2019 -30 July 2019. Age involved upto 80 years. Total 5400 urine samples received in Laboratory. Patients were recorded in proforma, clinical history and urine reports. 30 ml urine is required for analysis with requisition form. They were examined for proteins, glucose, ketones, bilirubin, blood using 10 parameters urine test strips and cells, cast, crystals microscopy using light microscope.
Results: Our study involved patients upto 80 years of age. Maximum number of samples 63.3 % were obtained from females. The occurance of pregnant women was 5.4 % and urinary tract infection in pregnant women was 9.2 %. The abnormal findings in this study was 31.4 %. The abnormal physical findings were dark urine 30.7 % and hazy urine 17.4 %. In this study proteinuria was 16.2 %, glycosuria was 5.3 %, ketones in urine was 2.6 %, positive bilirubin in urine was 0.03%, pyuria was 18.6 %, haematuria was 12.5 % and bacteriuria was 6.8 %.
Conclusion: This urine analysis study will be helpful to provide informations of patient’s health to clinician for investigation and management of diseases.
Keywords: Routine investigations, Reagent strips, Microscopy.
References
- Harsh Mohan, Practical Pathology, Fourth Edition, Chapter 56, Physical and Chemical examination, Page no. 233
- Harold Varley, Practical Clinical Biochemistry, Fourth Edition, Chapter viii, Urinary deposites, page no. 153
- Shirish M Kawthalkar, essentials of Clinical Pathology, First edition, Chapter 1 Examination of urine, Page no. 21
- Danielle Cristina Alves Feitosa I; Márcia Guimarães da SilvaII; Cristina Maria Garcia de Lima ParadaIII Accuracy of simple urine tests for diagnosis of urinary tract infections in low-risk pregnant women, Enfermagem vol.17 no.4 Ribeirão Preto July/Aug. 2009.
- Shahina Yasmin, Evaluation of frequency of abnormal Urine R.E tests in Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Islamic International Medical College, Rawalpindi, Rawal Med J 2010;35:257-261.
- Mary M. Mcdonald, Daniel Swagerty, Louis Wetzel, Assessment of Microscopic Hematuria in Adults, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, 2006 May 15;73(10):1748-1754.
- Kevin F. Foley, PhD, Joseph Wasserman, BS, Are Unexpected Positive Dipstick Urine Bilirubin Results Clinically Significant? A Retrospective Review, Laboratory Medicine, Volume 45, Issue 1, February 2014, Pages 59–61.
- Martin steggall, Urine sample and analysis, Nursing Standard. 22, 14-16, 42-45.december 12 : vol 22 no 14-16 : 2007
- Joris Penders, Tom Fiers, Joris R. Delanghe, Joris Penders, Tom Fiers, Joris R. Delanghe, Clinical Chemistry Dec 2002, 48 (12) 2236-2241.
- Melissa Yeoh, Nai Kid Lai, Daniel Anderson, Vinesh Appadurai, Macroscopic haematuria, A urological approach, Volume 42, No.3, March 2013 Pages 123-126.