Title:  Comparison of preloading versus coloading with crystalloid for elective caesarean section done under low dose spinal anaesthesia – A double blind randomised trial

Authors: Dr Ankita Chandel, Dr Nisha Sharma, Dr Manjit Singh Kanwar

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v8i1.124

Abstract

Background: Spinal anaesthesia is now an established technique for lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) but is associated with maternal hypotension. We intended to compare the use of preloading vscoloading with crystalloid for prevention of same.

Methods: Fifty parturients with American Society of Anesthesiologists’ physical status 1 or 2 undergoing elective LSCS were recruited. Twenty five patients in group P (n =25) and group C (n =25)  received 15 mL/kg of ringer lactate 20 minute before spinal anaesthesia and just after spinal anaesthesia respectively in both groups. Blood pressure and heart rate were recorded at 1 min interval starting 1 min after intrathecal injection till the first 10 min, every 5 min till the next 20 min and every 10 min thereafter till the end of the surgery. Data was tabulated using Microsoft excel (2010) and analyzed using the SPSS (version 8) software. Student's t-test was used for quantitative data and the Chi square test for qualitative data.

Results: The minimum mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) values recorded in the two groups were 90 ± 12.5 mm Hg in group P and 100 ± 9.5 mm Hg in group C (P = 0.043) at 7th and 6th minute respectively. The mean number of doses of mephentermine were more in group P (1.56±0.234) compared to group C (0.75±0.452). (P< 0.0001).

Conclusion: Coloading provides a better alternative than preloading for prevention of maternal hypotension secondary to spinal anaesthesia given for caesarean section.

References

  1. Ng K, Parsons J, Cyna AM, Middleton P. Spinal versus epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2:CD003765.
  2. Somboonviboon W, Kyokong O, Charuluxananan S, Narasethakamol A. Incidence and risk factors of hypotension and bradycardia after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008;91:181-187.
  3. Mueller MD, Bruhwiler H, Schupfer GK, Luscher KP. Higher rate of fetalnacidemia after regional anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:131-4.
  4. Shnider SM, Lorimier AA, Asling JH, Morishima HO. Vasopressors in obstetrics I I: Fetal hazards of methoxamine administration during obstetric spinal anesthesia. Am J ObstetGynecol 1970;106:680-6.
  5. Greiss FC Jr, Crandell DL. Therapy for hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia during pregnancy. JAMA 1965;191:793-6.
  6. Marx GF, Cosmi EV, Wollman SB. Biochemical status and clinical condition of mother and infant at cesarean section. AnesthAnalg 1969;48:986-94.
  7. KeeNgan WD, Khaw KS, Lee BB, Ng FF, Wong MM. Randomized controlled study of colloid preload before spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Br J Anaesth 2001;87:772-4.
  8. Pouta AM, Karinen J, Vuolteenaho OJ, Laatikainen TJ. Effect of intravenous fluid preload on vasoactive peptide secretion during caesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Anesthesia 1996;51:128-32.
  9. Park GE, Hauch MA, Curlin F, Datta S, Bader AM. The effects of varying volumes of crystalloid administration before cesarean delivery on maternal hemodynamics and colloid osmotic pressure. AnesthAnalg 1996;83:292-303
  10. Hahn RG, Svensen C. Plasma dilution and the rate of infusion of Ringer’s solution. Br J Anaesth 1997; 79: 64–7.
  11. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002; 21: 1539–58.

Corresponding Author

Dr Nisha Sharma

Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesia Dr RKGMC Hamirpur