Title: Diagnosis of Chronic Rhinosinusitis – CT Paranasal Sinus and Diagnostic Nasal Endoscopy: A Comparative Study

Authors: Peri Sreekavya, G.Raghunadha Babu, P.S.R.Rajeswari, Kalyani Hanumanthu

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v8i1.41

Abstract

Rhinitis and Sinusitis usually coexist and are concurrent in most individuals; thus, the correct terminology is now Rhinosinusitis. Most guidelines and expert panel documents now have adoptedthe term Rhinosinusitis instead of sinusitis. It is an inflammatory condition affecting thelining of the sinuses and nasal passages that can be variablein its clinical presentation. Proper diagnosis and classification of this disorder are important for effective management.

The Diagnosis of Chronic Rhinosinusitis based on various diagnostic modalities like CT PNS and Diagnostic Nasal endoscopy and their efficacy of precise diagnosis was evaluated. The accuracy was determined to assess the role of nasal endoscopy. Patients with age morethan 12 presenting for the assessment of chronicrhinosinusitis, not responding to medical treatment for more than 12 weeks, suffering from at least two or more of the symptoms like nasal obstruction, anterior or posteriornasal discharge, abnormalities of smell, and headache or facial pains were prospectively analyzed. All the selected patients were subjected to nasal endoscopy, followed by CTPNS. The Endoscopic findings were scored according to the Lund Kennedy scoring system. The CT PNS scans were scored according to the Lund Mackay scoring system.

The clinical diagnosis of CRS was determined based on the published sinusitis guideline criteria for adults, and the nasal endoscopic findings were compared with the diagnostic gold standard CT scan. A total of 100 patients were studied in this prospective hospital-based study.

Endoscopy was able to diagnose 84 % as CRS based on Lund–Kennedy score ≥ 2. 91 % patients could be labelled as CRS based on Lund–Mackey scores ≥ 4. On correlating the nasal endoscopy and CT PNS, it was found that sensitivity was 84.61 %, specificity was 22.22 %, PPV was 91.66 %, NPV was 12.5 %. The positive likelihood ratio of 1.08 and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.69 was found, and the p-value was found to be 0.1345, which confirms thatthere is no significant difference in diagnosing CRS by either modality. The addition of nasal endoscopy helps to reduce the use of CT, lowering costs, and radiation exposure.

Keywords: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), Diagnostic nasal endoscopy (DNE), Computed tomography of paranal sinuses (CT PNS).

References

  1. Kennedy DW, Hwang PH. Rhinology - Diseases of the Nose, Sinuses, and Skull Base. Newyork: Thieme; 2012. p110.
  2. Fokkens W, Lund Vet al. European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps. The ERS / EAACI guidelines for acute and chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyps based on systematic review. Rhinology supplement 23. 2007:1–136.
  3. Lohiya SS, Patel SV, Pawde AM, et al. Comparative Study of Diagnostic Nasal Endoscopy and CT Paranasal Sinuses in Diagnosing Chronic Rhinosinusitis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Jun;68(2):224–229.
  4. Claire H. The Lund–Mackay staging system for chronic rhinosinusitis: How is it used, and what does it predict? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007; 137:555–561.
  5. Lund V, Mackay IS. Staging in chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinology. 1993; 31:183–184.
  6. Lund VJ, Kennedy DW. Quantification for staging sinusitis. The Staging and Therapy Group. Ann OtolRhinolLaryngol Suppl. 1995; 167:17–21.
  7. Stankiewicz JA et al. Nasal endoscopy and thedefinition and diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis. OtolaryngolHead Neck Surg. 2002; 126:623–627.
  8. Bhattacharyya N, et al. Evaluating the diagnosis ofchronic rhinosinusitis based on clinical guidelines and endoscopy.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010; 143:147–151.
  9. Benninger MS. Nasal endoscopy: its role in office diagnosis. Am J Rhinol. 1997; 11:177–180.
  10. Rosbe KW, Jones KR. The usefulness of patient symptoms and nasal endoscopy in the diagnosis of chronic sinusitis. Am J Rhinol. 1998; 12:167–171.
  11. Ferguson BJ, Narita M, Yu VL, Wagener MM, Gwaltney JM Jr. A prospectiveobservational study of chronic rhinosinusitis: environmental triggers and antibioticimplications. Clin Infect Dis. 2012; 54:62–68.

Corresponding Author

P.S.R.Rajeswari

Assistant Professor, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Govt. ENT Hospital, Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India