Title: Cultural adaptation, reliability, and validation of the Mizo-Version of Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) in the rural Northeast Indian population

Authors: Andrew Lalchhuanawma, Divya Sanghi

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i11.155

Abstract

Introduction: The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a popular instrument which is used extensively for measuring the severity of depression, for both screening purposes and in clinical practice. The BDI consists of 21 items; each item was scored on a 4-pointer Likert scale starting from 0 to 3, giving the total possible items score to 63.Many of the existing patient-reported outcome measures were designed and established for the Western and European English speaking nation. The need for the cross-cultural adaptation and linguistic translation arose as the psychometric properties of BDI scale has never been validated in Mizo culture of the rural northeast Indian population.

Objective: To establish the reliability and construct validity of the Mizo-BDI. This study aims to culturally adapt and translate the patient reported outcome measure of BDI into Mizo tawng (an official language of Mizoram).

Method: 49 community dwelling citizens from the rural northeast Indian primary health-care settings participated for the study. Subjects participated voluntarily in the study after taking a formal consent. The study followed the recommended guidelines for back-translation of the English-BDI into Mizo-BDI.

Results: Internal consistency determined by Cronbach alpha was found to have a good reliability (α=0.89), test-retest reliability determined by Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) showed an excellent reliability (ICC=0.96, 95% CI= 0.94–0.98). For construct validity test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient analyzed the relationship between Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and BDI and found to have a slight relationship and significant (r=0.31, p<0.05)        

Conclusion: The study results validated the M-BDI to be easy to comprehend, reliable and valid assessment tool for measuring the severity of depression in the Mizo speaking rural population of Mizoram, India.

Keywords: depression, reliability, validity, beck depression inventory.

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). 2015, Depression https:// www.who.int/ mental health/ management/depression/en/
  2. Erica Orange and Jared Weiner https:// medium.com/ positive-returns/ a-mental-health-pandemic-is-the-world-getting-more-addicted-anxious-and-lonely-4e45bf533ae5
  3. Tucci, V., & Moukaddam, N. (2017). We are the hollow men: The worldwide epidemic of mental illness, psychiatric and behavioral emergencies, and its impact on patients and providers. Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock, 10(1), 4–6.
  4. Lee, E. H., Lee, S. J., Hwang, S. T., Hong, S. H., & Kim, J. H. (2017). Reliability and Validity of the Beck Depression Inventory-II among Korean Adolescents. Psychiatry investigation, 14(1), 30–36.
  5. Ozcelik, H. S., Ozdel, K., Bulut, S. D., &Orsel, S. (2015). The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (Turkish BSSI). Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni / Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 25(2), 141-150.
  6. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. BDI-II: Beck Depression Inventory Manual. 2nd Ed. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1996.
  7. Reeve BB, Wyrwich KW, Wu AW, Velikova G, Terwee GB, et al. ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research.
  8. Barrow JM, Khandhar PB. Research Ethics. [Updated 2019 Jun 22]. In: Stat Pearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): Stat Pearls Publishing; 2019 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459281/
  9. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961;4(6):561-71.
  10. Erin EK, Timothy SC and Weinberger M. Accuracy of the Pain Numeric Rating Scale as a Screening Test in Primary Care. Society of General Internal Medicine. (2007).
  11. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F , et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000; 25 : 3186 – 91.
  12. Terry K. Koo, Mae Y. Li. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine (2016) 15, 155–163.
  13. Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull. 1955 Jul;52(4):281-302.
  14. Madhukar H. Trivedi. The link between Depression and Physical Symptoms.The Primary Care Companion to the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 2004; 6(suppl 1): 12–16.
  15. Ohayon MM, Schatzberg AF. Using pain to predict depressive morbidity in the general population. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2003; 60: 39–47. 

Corresponding Author

Divya Sanghi Ph.D

Associate Professor, Faculty of Applied Sciences,

Manav Rachna International Institute of Research & Studies, Faridabad, India