Details
Category: Volume 07 Issue 11 November 2019
Hits: 1126

Title: To evaluate the anthropometric profile of auricle among school going children in tribal belt of Chhattisgarh, India

Authors: Rajni Thakur, Vishakha Sonakke, Deepti Gautam

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i11.69

Abstract

Background: The auricle was resides outside the head. Auricle was different size and shape affected by both sex, all age, races and play an important role in forensic investigation. Otapostasis was the most common deformity of the auricle.

Aim: To study the morphometric measurements of the auricle and to evaluate otapostasis among school going children in tribal belt of Chhattisgarh.

Materials and Methods: School children of three tribal belt of Chhattisgarh, were selected at random and their morph metric measurements like auricle lengths, auricle projection and front of face height of both auricles were taken with the help of a digital vernier caliper. Total 550 healthy students aged group 9 to 15 years included in current research. Children with any auricle deformity, previous auricle surgeries, auricle tumors, history of auricle trauma were excluded from the current research.

Result: In present study, mean auricle height was 48.95±5.75 (right auricle) and 48.98±5.77 (left auricle) and otapostasis was 18.86±4.09 (auricle ear) and 18.87±4.10 (left auricle) among all students. Mean auricle height and otapostasis was higher in males than in females. Gender related differences were found not significant. Among all study participants 25.81% had an otapostasis left auricle while 25.09% had an otapostasis right ear. Among male students, 28.48 % had otapostasis right and left ears while female students, 23.63% had right auricle otapostasis and 24.67% otapostasis left auricle.

Conclusion: otapostasis more in males than females among tribal school children. These measurements are keen and valuable in evaluation of auricle abnormalities, reconstruction and in otomorphology for identification of tribal belt children.

Keywords: Tribal belt, Digital Vernier calipers, Otapostasis, Auricle.

References

  1. Ito I,I Keda, et al. Anthropometric study on normal human auricle in Japan, Nippon Jibiimkoka Gakkai Kalha,2001; 104 (2): 165- 174.
  2. Iannerelli AV. Ear Identification, Forensic identification series, Fremont, California, Paramount Publishing Company. 1989.
  3. Meijerman L, Van der Lungt..Cross sectional anthropometric study of the external ear. J.Forensic, Sci.2007, 52: 286 – 293.
  4. Keith A. The Significance of certain features and types of the External Ear. Nature. 1901; 65:16-21.
  5. Kalra D, et at. Anthropometric measurements of external ear an in vivo study. Int. J. Ethan Res Med Dent. Care. 2015, 2 (3): 106.
  6. Alexander KS, Stott DJ, Sivakumar B, Kang N. A morphometric study of the human ear. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2011; 64 : 41-47.
  7. De Carlo D, Metaxas D, Stone M. An Anthropometric face model using variation techniques. Proceeding of the 25th annual conference of computer graphic and interactive New York : ACM, 19 – 24 July 1998:67-74.
  8. Ekanem AU, Garba SH, Musa TS, Dare ND. Anthropometric study of the pinna among adult Nigerians resident in Maiduguri metropolis. J.Med.Sci.2010; 10(6):176-180.
  9. Purkait R, Singh P. Anthropometry of normal human auricle: a study of adult Indian men. Aesth. Plast.Surg. 2007; 31 (4): 372 -379.
  10. Farkas LG. Ear morphology in treacher Collins, apert’s and crouzon’s syndrome. Eur Archit. Oto-rhino-lary 220(1-2): 153-157.
  11. Alexander KS, Stott DJ. A morphometric study of human ear. Journal of plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic surgery. 2011; 64(1): 41-47.
  12. Deopa D, Thakkar HK, Chandra Prakash, Niranjan R, Barua MP. Anthropometric measurements of external ear of medical students in Uttarakhand region. Journal of Anatomical society of India. 2013; 62; 79-83.
  13. Bozkir MG, Karakas P and Yavz M et al. Morphometry of external ear in our adult population. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2006; 30: 81-85.
  14. Muteweye W, Mututi GI. Anthropometric study of the external ear of primary school children of Harare, Zimbabwe. Annals of Med. and Sur. 2015;4: 287 – 292.
  15. Skaria A, Stott DJ, Sivakumar B, Kang N. A morph metric study of the human ear. J Plast Recon Aesth Surg. 2011; 64: 41- 47.
  16. Rucker MJB, Patel J, Sullivan PK, Mckinney P. Morphometric study of the external ear: age and sex related differences. Plast Recon Surg.2003; 112: 647 – 652.
  17. Barut C, Aktunc E. Anthropometric measurements of the external ear in a group of Turkish primary school students. Aesth Plast Surg.2006; 30:255-259.
  18. Farkas LG, Posnick LC, Hreczko TM. Anthropometric growth study of the ear. Cleft Palate- Craniofacial J. 1992; 29 (4):324- 329.
  19. Wang, Yan Dong, Yimin Zhao, Shizhu Bai, Cuofeng Wu. Computed tomography of the auricle in Han population of north China.Int J Surg Recon.2011; 84 (1): 34- 40.

Corresponding Author

Rajni Thakur

Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Pt.J.N.M.Medical College, Raipur, (C.G.)