Title: Incidence of Ocular Symptoms Following Percutaneous Coronary Procedures- A Single Centre Experience

Authors: Suresh Madhavan, Gargi Sathish, Jayaprasad N, V.Sudhakumary, Elizabeth John, Raihanathul Misiriya, K.Jayaprakash, V.L.Jayaprakash, Raju George

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i8.134

Abstract

        

Aim of the study: To find the incidence of new ocular symptoms following transradial diagnostic and therapeutic coronary catheterization and associated risk factors.

Materials & Methods: Prospective observational study of 500 consecutive patients satisfying the inclusion criteria attending our tertiary health centre for transradial coronary procedures were observed for post procedural new ocular symptoms and compared with 500 patients undergoing same via transfemoral approach.

Results: 76 patients (incidence 7.6%) developed new ocular symptoms in the form of black-outs, Amaurosis fugax and field loss. 75% of these patients belonged to radial access group. 40 patients had reversible visual symptoms as a sequalae of cerebral hypo perfusion and 36 patients had symptoms of retinal embolism. Clinically apparent changes in vision was noted in 9 [0.9%] patients. In those with new ocular symptoms, the risk factors found were age, periprocedural hypertension, vascular tortuosity, procedure done through radial artery approach in patients with height<155cm ,prolonged procedural time. 1patient had uniocular Central Retinal Artery Occlusion [CRAO] with permanent loss of vision. 3 patients had features of Branch Retinal Artery Occlusion [BRAO] and 5 patients had peripheral retinal embolus.

Conclusions: Although rare, incidence of ocular embolic complications were higher with percutaneous coronary procedures via radial approach. Patients with height <155 cm may be benefitted when the procedure is done via femoral approach. Cardiologists should try to avoid excessive catheter manipulations while doing procedures. Prompt diagnosis and treatment may reduce extent of damage caused by vascular embolism.

Keywords: Ocular embolism, coronary angiography, coronary angioplasty.

References

  1. Fuchs, S., Stabile, E., Kinnaird, T. D., et al. (2002). Stroke complicating percutaneous coronary interventions: Incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications. Circulation, 106 (1), 86-91.
  2. Fukumoto, Y., Tsutsui, H., Tsuchihashi, M., et al. (2003). The incidence and risk factors of cholesterolembolization syndrome, a complication of cardiac catheterization: a prospective study. J Am CollCardiol, 42 (2), 211-216.
  3. Babu, S. C., Piccorelli, G. O., Shah, P. M., et al. (1989). Incidence and results of arterial complications among16, 350 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization J VascSurg, 10 (2), 113-116.
  4. Sankaranarayanan R, Msairi A, Davis GK: Stroke complicating cardiaccatheterization - A preventable and treatable complication. Ann InternMed 1996, 122:249-253.
  5. Jassal DS, Fast MD, McGinn G: Multifocal brain MRI hypo intensities secondary to cardiac catheterization. Neurology 2000, 54:2023-4.
  6. Bashore TM, Gehrig T: Cholesterol emboli after invasive cardiacprocedures. Am CollCardiol2003, 42:217-8
  7. Segal AZ, Abernethy WB, Palacios IFet al; Stroke as acomplication of cardiac catheterization: risk factors and clinical features. Neurology2001, 56:975-7.
  8. Busing KA, Schulte Sasse C, Fluchter S et al Cerebral infarction: incidence and risk factors after diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization prospective evaluation at diffuse weighted MRI. Radiology 2005, 235:177-183.
  9. Bruno A, Jones WL, Austin JK, Carter S, Qualls C: Vascular outcome in menwith asymptomatic retinal cholesterol emboli: a cohort study. Ann InternMed 1995, 122:249-253.
  10. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Meuer SM: Retinal emboli and stroke. Arch Ophthalmol 1999, 117:1063-8.
  11. Baker ML, Hand PJ, Wang JJ, and Wong TY: Retinal signs and stroke: revisitingthe link between the eye and brain. Stroke 2008, 39:1371-1379.
  12. Ascione R, Ghosh A, Reeves BC, Arnold J, Potts M, Shah A, Angelini GD:Retinal and cerebral micro embolization during coronary artery bypasssurgery: a randomized, controlled trial. Circulation 2005, 112:3833-3838.
  13. Blauth C, Arnold J, Kohner EM, Taylor KM: Retinal micro embolism during cardiopulmonary bypass demonstrated by fluorescein angiography. Lancet 1986, 2:837-839.
  14. Wilentz JR, Chati Z, Krafft V, Amor M: Retinal embolization during carotidangioplasty and stenting: mechanisms and role of cerebral protection systems. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002, 56:320-327.
  15. Kojuri J, Mehdizadeh M, Rostami H, Shahidian D. Clinical significance ofretinal emboli during diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac catheterization in patients with coronary artery disease. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2011;11:5.
  16. Nakata A, Seciguchi Y, Hirota S, Yamashita Y, Takazakura E: Central retinalartery occlusion following cardiac catheterization. Jpn Heart J 2002,43:187-192.
  17. Zhang Y, Cho CH, Atchaneeyasakul LO, McFarland T, Appukuttan B, Stout T:Activation of the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway in a rat model of acentral retinal artery occlusion. IOVC 2005, 46:2133-2139.
  18. Bucci FA, Dimitsopulos TM, Krohel GB. Branch retinalartery occlusion secondary to percutaneous transluminalcoronary angioplasty. Br J Ophthalmol 1989;73:309–10.
  19. Thyer I, Kovoor P, Wang JJ, Taylor B, Kifley A, Lindley R: Coronary catheterization does not lead to retinal artery in short term follow-up of cardiac patients. Stroke 2007, 38:2370.
  20. Kreis AJ, Nguyen T, Rogers S, Wang JJ, Harper CA: Acute retinal arteriolaremboli after cardiac catheterization. Stroke 2008, 39(11):3086-7.
  21. Hayreh SS, Zimmerman MB, Kimura A, Sanon A. Central retinal arteryocclusion. Retinal survival time. Exp Eye Res. 2004; 78(3):723–36.
  22. Opremcak E, Rehmar AJ, Ridenour CD, Borkowski LM, Kelley JK. Restoration of retinal blood flow via translumenal Nd:YA Gembolysis/embolectomy (TYL/E)for central and branch retinal artery occlusion. 2008;28(2):226–35.
  23. García-Arumí J, Martinez-Castillo V, Boixadera A, Fonollosa A, Corcostegui B. Surgical embolus removal in retinal artery occlusion. Br J Ophthalmol .2006;90 (10):1252–5.
  24. Schumacher M, Schmidt D, Jurklies B et al EAGLE-Study Group. Central retinal artery occlusion: local intra-arterial fibrinolysis versus conservative treatment, a multicenter randomized trial. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(7):1367–75.
  25. Gordham A, Ray W: Retinal cholesterol embolism and visual loss postcarotid angioplasty and stenting. Am J Case Rep [12169] 2008, 9:159-162 [http://www.amjcaserep.com].

Corresponding Author

Dr Gargi Sathish

Associate Professor, Government Medical College, Kottayam, Kerala, India 686008