Details
Category: Volume 07 Issue 08 August 2019
Hits: 1095

Title: Prevalence and Pattern of Distribution of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars on Digital Panoramic Radiograph among Central Kerala Population: A Cross Sectional Study

Authors: Shamji Shajahan, Sheeba Padiyath, Anju Elizabeth Thomas

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i8.41

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this cross sectional study was to assess the prevalence and pattern of impacted mandibular third molars on digital panoramic radiographs.

Methods: In the study we reviewed 745 digital panoramic radiographs of patients treated in our institution from 2017 June to 2018 June. The radiographs were retrieved from the archives of Department of Radiology and were evaluated for the prevalence of impacted mandibular third molars, their pattern of distribution and associated pathological conditions. The study also evaluated presence of other impacted teeth as well as partially impacted mandibular third molars.

Results: From the total of 745 radiographs reviewed, a total of 293 impacted teeth were observed. Mandibular third molars (198) were the most commonly encountered impactions, followed by maxillary third molars (69), maxillary canines (11) and supernumerary teeth (15). 135 subjects (18.1%) presented with at least one impacted mandibular third molar. 105 (14.1%) subjects presented with impacted mandibular left third molar and 93(12.5%) presented with impacted mandibular right molar, 22 (3%) and 21(2.8%) subjects presented with partially impacted mandibular right and left molars respectively. The analysis of the pattern of the impacted mandibular teeth showed that majority were in the mesioangular (47%) position, followed by horizontal (32.32%), vertical (15.15%) and distoangular (5.56%) positions.

Conclusion: The study revealed that 18% cases showed impacted mandibular third molar, with mesioangular (47%) pattern was more frequent.

Keywords: Impacted mandibular third molar, Impaction, Mesioangular, Molar, Kerala.

References

  1. Minor oral surgical procedures. Textbook of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 3rdedition. Jaypee-brothers medical publishers. New Delhi 2012.145-150.
  2. Quek SL, Tay KH, Toh SL, Lim KC. Pattern of third molar impaction in a Singapore Chinese population: a retrospective radiographic survey. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 32(5): 548-52.
  3. Hou R, Kong L, Ao J et al. Investigation of impacted permanent teeth except the third molar in Chinese patients through an X-ray study. J Oral MaxillofacSurg 2010; 68:762-7
  4. Ramamurthy A, Pradha J, Jeeva S, Jeddy N, Sunitha J, Kumar S et al. Prevalence of Mandibular Third Molar Impaction and Agenesis: A Radiographic South Indian Study. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol, 2012 ;24:1736.
  5. Shahbaz S, Khan M. Evaluation of mandibular third molar impaction distribution on OPG: a digital radiographic study. IJADS. 2017;3 (4):393-96.
  6. Schersten E, Lysell L, Rohlin M. Prevalence of impacted third molars in dental students Swed Dent J 1989;13:7-13.
  7. Gunduz K, Acikgoz A, Egrioglu E. Radiologic investigation of prevalence associated pathologies and dental anomalies of non-third molar impacted teeth in Turkish oral patients. Chin J Dent Res. 2011;14(2):141-146.
  8. El-Khateeb SM, Arnout EA, Hifnawy T. Radiographic assessment of impacted teeth and associated pathosis prevalence. Saudi Med J.2015;36(8):973-79.
  9. Jung YH, Cho BH. Prevalence of missing and impacted third molars in adults aged 25 years and above. Imaging Sci Dent 2013; 43: 219-225.
  10. Syed KB, Zaheer KB, Ibrahim M, Bagi MA, Assiri MA. Prevalence of impacted molar teeth among Saudi population in Asir Region, Saudi Arabia - a retrospective study of 3 years. J Int Oral Health 2013; 5: 43-47.
  11. Dachi SF, Howell FV. A survey of 3,874 routine full-mouth radiographs. II. A study of impacted teeth. Oral Surg. 1961;14:1165–1169.
  12. Al-Delaimi TN, Abood SW, Khalil AA. The evaluation of impacted third molars using panoramic radiograph. ISSN. 2010;2(1):27-33.
  13. Hellman M. Our third molar  teeth:  their eruption,  presence  and    Dental Cosmos 1936; 78:750-62.
  14. Fardi A, Kondylidou-Sidira A, Bachour Z, Parisis N, Tsirlis A. Incidence of impacted and supernumerary teeth-a radiographic study in a North Greek population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011 Jan 1;16 (1):e56- 61.
  15. Othman RJ, Tin-Oo. Impacted mandibular third molars among patients attending Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia. Archives of Orofacial Sciences.2009, 4(1): 7-12.
  16. Al- Faleh W. Completely impacted teeth in dentate and edentulous jaws. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal 2009; 29(2): 255-260.
  17. Reddy KVG, Prasad KVV. Prevalence of third molar impactions in urban population of age 22-30 years in South India: An epidemological study. J Indian Dent Assoc 2011; 5:609‒11.
  18. Al-Anqudi SM, Al-Sudairy S, Al-Hosni A, Al-Maniri A. Prevalence and pattern of third molar impaction: a retrospective study of radiographs in Oman. Sultan Qaboos U Med J.2014; 14(3):e388–e392.
  19. Dhuha Al Feeli, Yasmeen Sebaa, Dr. Adel Al-Asfour“ Prevalence of impacted teeth in adult patients: A radiographic study of Kuwaiti population”, Elective project study.
  20. Polat HB, Oan F, KaraI, Ozdemir H, Sinan, Sivas, etal. Prevalence of commonly found pathoses associated with mandibular impacted third molars based on panoramic radiographs in Turkish population. Oral Surg Oral Med Ural Pathol Oral Radiol Endod.2008;105:e41-e47.

Corresponding Author

Shamji Shajahan

Mar Baselios Dental College, Kothamangalam, Kerala, India