Title: Use of oral midazolam as a premedication in patients undergoing diagnostic UGI Endoscopy: A double blind placebo controlled randomized trial

Authors: Dr Mamta Sharma, Dr Anil Sharma

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i5.108

Abstract

Introduction: To investigate the safety and efficacy of oral midazolam as premedication for patients undergoing upper GI endoscopy, A double blind placebo controlled randomized trial was conducted.

Methods: A total of 150 patients were randomized to receive either 7.5 mg oral midazolam (n = 75) or a placebo (n = 75) as premedication in patients undergoing upper GI endoscopy. Primary outcome measure was anxiety score (visual analog scale) during procedure. Secondary outcome measures were overall tolerance, extent of amnesia, patient willingness to repeat the procedure and hemodynamic changes after medication.

Result: The median anxiety score during the procedure in the midazolam group was significantly lower than in the control group (1.8 vs. 3.6). A significantly higher number of patients in the midzolam group graded overall tolerance as excellent or good as compared to control group (72% vs. 48%). A significantly higher number of patients in the midazolam group reported a partial to complete amnesia response as compared to control (52% vs.32%). Patients in the midazolam group were more willing to repeat the procedure if necessary (88% vs. 64%). There was no statistically significant difference in hemodynamic changes between groups.

Conclusions: Oral administration of midazolam as premedication is safe and effective method of sedation that significantly reduces anxiety and improves overall tolerance for patients undergoing upper GI endoscopy.

References

  1. Quine MA, Bell GD, McCloy RF, Charlton JE, Devlin HB, Hopkins A. Prospective audit of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England: safety, staffing, and sedation methods. Gut 1995;36:462-7.
  2. Froehlich F, Schwizer W, Thorens J, Kohler M, Gonvers JJ, Fried M. Conscious sedation for gastroscopy: patient tolerance and cardiorespiratory parameters. Gastroenterology 1995;108:697-704.
  3. Christe C, Janssens JP, Armenian B, Hermann F, Vogt N. Midazolam sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in older persons: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000;48:1398-403.
  4. Laluna L, Allen ML, Dimarino AJ Jr. The comparison of midazolam and topical lidocaine spray versus the combination of midazolam, meperidine, and topical lidocaine spray to sedate patients for upper endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;53:289-93.
  5. Bell GD, Spickett GP, Reeve PA, Morden A, Logan RF. Intravenous midazolam for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a study of 800 consecutive cases relating dose to age and sex of patient. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1987;23:241-3.
  6. Thompson AM, Wright DJ, Murray W, Ritchie GL, Burton HD,Stonebridge PA. Analysis of 153 deaths after upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: room for improvement? Surg Endosc 2004;18:22-5.
  7. Hedenbro JL, Ekelund M, Aberg T, Lindblom A. Oral sedation for diagnostic upper endoscopy. Endoscopy 1991;23:8-10.
  8. McHenry R, Crabb D, Brunelle R, Lehman GA. Oral medications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using small diameter endoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;34:327-31.
  9. Douglas JG, Nimmo WS, Wanlesss R, Jarvie DR, Heading RC, Finlayson ND. Sedation for upper gastro-intestinal endoscopy. A comparison oral temazepam and i.v. diazepam. Br J Anaesth 1980;52:811-5.
  10. Liacouras CA, Mascarenhas M, Poon C, Wenner WJ. Placebo-controlled trial assessing the use of oral midazolam as premedication to conscious sedation for pediatric endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;47:455-60.
  11. Martinez JL, Sutters KA, Waite S, Davis J, Median E, Montano N, et al. A comparison of oral diazepam versus midazolam, administered with intravenous meperidine, as premedication to sedation for pediatric endoscopy. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1997;25:261-6.
  12. Kuganeswaran E, Clarkston WK, Cuddy PG, Quiason SG, Pandya PK, Dierenfeldt WT, et al. A double-blind placebo controlled trial of oral midazolam as premedication before flexible sigmoi-doscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:3215-9.
  13. Maltais F, Laberge F, Laviolette M. A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study of lorazepam as premedication for bronchoscopy. Chest 1996;109:1195-8.
  14. Al-Atrakchi HA. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy without sedation: a prospective study of 2000 examinations. Gastrointest Endosc 1989; 35:79-81.
  15. Fisher NC, Bailey S, Gibson JA. A prospective, randomized controlled trial of sedation vs. no sedation in outpatient diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 1998;30:21-4.
  16. Mccluskey A, Meakin GH. Oral administration of midazolam as premedicant for paediatric day-case anesthesia. Anesthesia 1994;49: 782-5.
  17. Kikuchi K, Konishia P, Watanabe Y. Efficacy of oral midazolam as premedication in adult. Masui-Jap J Anesthiol 1994;43:1824-7.
  18. Abraham N, Barkun A,Larocque M, Fallone C, Mayrand S, Baffis V, et al. Predicting which patients undergoing upper endoscopy comfortably without conscious sedation.Gastrointest Endos 2002;56:180-9.
  19. Smith MT, Eadie MJ, Brophy TO. The pharmacokinetics of midazolam in man. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1981;19:271-8.
  20. Mui, L-M., Teoh, A.Y.B., Ng, E.K.W.  et al. Premedication with orally administered midazolam in adults undergoing diagnostic upper endoscopy: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 61: 195–200

Corresponding Author

Dr Anil Sharma

Assistant Professor Gastroenterology, Govt. Medical College, Kota, India