Title: A Comparative Study to Assess the Inter-Relationship of Lip Prints with Facial Index and Cephalic Index

Authors: Dr Jithin P, Dr Chacko Kalliath, Dr Archana Mukunda, Anuradha E Sunil, Dr Arun Mohan, Dr Neethu Kader

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i5.90

Abstract

Introduction: Forensics plays an important role in personal identification. Lip prints, facial index and cephalic index are of utmost importance in the field of forensics. However there is scarcity of studies which try to find a correlation between these three parameters.

Aim: To compare pattern of lip prints with facial index and cephalic index

Materials and Methods: In vivo study conducted on 30 healthy individuals in the age group of 17-21 years. Facial index and cephalic index were calculated based on measurements taken and lip prints were recorded for each individual

Result and Conclusion: The most common facial index observed was mesoprosopic, most common cephalic index was mesocephalic and the most common lip print was Type I whereas the least common type of lip print was Type 4 and Type I.

Keywords: Lip Prints, Facial Index, cephalic index.

References

  1. Lakshmi Kumari K, PVSS Vijaya Babu, P Kusuma Kumari, M Nagamani. A study of cephalic index and facial index in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, IndiaInt J Res Med Sci. 2015;3:656-658
  2. Tanuj Kancha, Kewal Krishan. Personal identification in forensic examinations. Anthropology 2013;2:114
  3. Venkatesh R, David MP. Cheiloscopy: An aid for personal identification. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2011;3(2):67-70
  4. Vahanwala SP et al. Study of lip prints as an aid to forensic methodology. J Indian Dent Assoc 2000; 71:269‑71.
  5. Sandhu SV et al. Study of lip print pattern in a Punjabi J Forensic Dent Sci. 2012; 4:24–8.
  6. Ragab AR et al. Characteristic patterns of lip prints in Egyptian population sample at Dhakalia governorate. IntJ Leg Med. 2012; 127:521–7.
  7. Himanshu Trivedi et al. Correlation between morphological facial index and canine relationship in adults − An anthropometric study. J Orofac Sci 2017;9:16-21
  8. Babatunde Olayemi Akinbami. Measurement of Cephalic Indices in Older Children and Adolescents of a Nigerian Population. BioMed Research International 2014; Article ID 527473, 5 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/527473.
  9. Priyadharshini K I, Ambika M, Sekar B, Mohanbabu V, Sabarinath B, Pavithra I. Comparison of cheiloscopy, odontometric, and facial index for sex determination in forensic dentistry. J Forensic Dent Sci 2018;10:88-91
  10. Sharma N, Eldomiaty Magda, Gutiérrez-Redomero E, Olufemi G A, Garud R & Sanchez-Andres A. Diversity of human lip prints: A collaborative study of ethnically distinct world populations Annals of human biology 2014;41: 10.3109/03014460.2014.885082.
  11. Sandhu SV, Bansal H, Monga P, Bhandari R. Study of lip print pattern in a Punjabi population. J Forensic Dent Sci 2012;4:24-8.
  12. Peeran SW, Naveen Kumar P G, Abdalla KA, Azaruk FA, Manipady S, Alsaid FM. A study of lip print patterns among adults of Sebha city, Libya. J Forensic Dent Sci 2015;7:67-70

Corresponding Author

Dr Archana Mukunda

Professor, Dept of Oral & Maxillofacial Pathology, Royal Dental College, Chalissery, Kerala, India