Title: Groin Hernia’s Presenting as Emergency: A Study Regarding Surgical Repair and Outcome in Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences & General Hospital, Kadapa

Authors: Dr Melpati Pavani, Dr J. Ramanaiah, Dr N. Prahalada Reddy

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i5.03

Abstract

Background and Objectives: A significant proportion of hernias require emergency surgery, which is associated with a higher postoperative complication rate than elective surgery and a less favourable outcome. Our aim is to look into the various groin hernias, which require surgical repair as an emergency and look into the various surgeries and also the complications which commonly arise during the patient’s hospital stay. 

Methods: 87 patients presenting acutely with symptomatic hernias to the casualty of Department of General Surgery, RIMS Medical College& general hospital, Kadapa who were consenting for surgery between January 2018 and December2018 were selected for the study. All information’s were recorded including age, sex, type of hernia, side and site of hernia, detailed symptamatology, signs, abdominal and local examination findings. We also recorded type of surgery done and operative findings. All patients were followed up during hospital stay and recovery monitored for development of any complications.

Results: Maximum incidence of complicated hernias was in the age group of 60-70 yrs. Even though Increased incidence of complicated hernias were noted among men with a male to female ratio more common 28:1,femoral hernias were more common in women. Right sided hernias were found to be more common (3.35:1).The most common symptom was groin swelling with pain followed by vomiting. Commonest site of obstruction was found to be deep ring. The commonest content was small intestine followed by omentum. The commonest procedure done was hernioplasty (87.3%). 10 out of 87 patients underwent resection anastomosis, and there is a significant association between mean hours of delay in hospitalization and who underwent resection and anastomosis (34.07 hrs.) compared to 7.55 hrs of delay among who did not undergo resection (p value <0.001).13 out of 87 patients had surgical site infection and it was the commonest complication (14.9%) in our study, and 4 patients was from the resection anastamosis group, with a significant association (p value0.038). 

References

  1. Davies M, Chris D, Gareth M-S, Ken S. Emergency Presentation of Abdominal Hernias: Outcome and Reasons for Delay in Treatment -A Prospective Study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007 J an;89(1):47-50.
  2. Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K. Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet. 2003 Nov 8;362(9395):1561-71.
  3. Akrami M, Hesarooeih AG, Barfei M, Zangouri V, Alborzi Z. Clinical Characteristics of Bowel Obstruction in Southern Iran; Results of a Single Center Experience. Bulletin of emergency & trauma. 2015 Jan;3(1):22.
  4. J.F: National University of colombiya: Department of Surgery, Santa Fe foundation of Bogota, Bogota, Colombia.
  5. A.S., Petrucelli.R.JII.Medicine ; an Illustrated history. New York; Harry N Abrams Publishers, 1987.
  6. I.M: A Selective History of Hernia Surgery in Late Eighteenth Century: The treatises of Percivall Pott, Jean Louis Petit ,D August Gottieb Richter, Don Antonio de Gimbemat and Pieter Camper. Surg Clin N Am :2003:83:1021-1044.
  7. Stoppa RE: The Midline Preperitonial approach and Prosthetic Repair of Groin Hernia, in Fitzgibbon. Jr. R.J, Greenburg. A.G. (eds): Nyhus and Codon’s Hernia, Smed, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins,2002,199.
  8. R. The management of certain abdominal hernia by intraabdominal closureof the neck of sac.Preliminary communication. Ann .R.Surgengl 1982; 64; 342-344.
  9. Arregui M.E. Laparoscopic Preperitoneal Herniorraphy, paper presented at annual meeting of the society of American Endoscopic Surgeons, 1991, Monterey, CA.
  10. Phillips .E..H., Carroll. B.Ji, Fallas. M.J., Laparoscopic preperitoneal Inguinal hernia repair without Preperitonial incision ;Surg Endosc:1993;l7:l 59.
  11. Skandalakis JE, Sandalakis LJ, Colborn GL, Androvlakis J, Mcclusky DA III, Sandalakis PN, Mirilas P. Surgical anatomy of the hemia rings. In: Fisher KB. Master of surgery, 5thedn.Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 2007; 168: 1857-1887.
  12. Quinn TH. Anatomy of Groin: A review from the Anatomist, in Fitzgibbons RJ Jr. Greenburg AG (eds), Nyhus and Codon’s Hernia, 5thth edition Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 2001: 55-70.
  13. Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Filipi CJ, Quinn TH. Inguinal hernia in Brunicardi FC et al. Schwartz’s principles of surgery, 8thedn. New York. McGraw Hill, 2005; 1353-1394.
  14. Nyhus LM. lliopubic tract repair of inguinal and femoral hernia: The posterior (preparitoneal) approach, in Baker RJ, Fisher JE. Master of Surgery, 4thedn Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 2001; 1943-1951.
  15. Skandalakis J.E, Sandalakis. L.J, Colbom. G.L, AndrovlakisJ, Mcclusky. DA. III, Sandalakis. P.N, Mirilas.P. Surgical Anatomy of the Hernial rings, in Fisher. J.E. Mastery of surgery, 5th ed Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2007; 168:1859-1887.
  16. Kulah B, Kulacoglu IH, Oruc MT et a1. Presentation and outcome of incarcerated external hernias in adults. Am J Surg 2001 Feb;181(2):101-104.
  17. Gallegos NC, Dawson J, Jarvis M, Hobsley M. Risk of strangulation in groin hernias.Br J Surg. 1991 0ct;78(10):1171-3
  18. Josef E. Fisher, Kirby I. Bland, Mastery of surgery, 6th edition, 2012
  19. H.B. Femoral Hernia Repair, in Cartier.D., Russell.R.C.G., Pitt.H.A., Atlas of General Surgery; 3rd ed. London, Hodder Arnold publication, 1996: 50-58.
  20. Mathur P. Hand hygiene: back to the basics of infection control. Indian J Med Res.Nov;134(5):611-20.
  21. Hernandez-Granados P, on tan on M, Lasala M, Garcia C, Arguello M, Medina I. Tension-free hernioplasty in primary inguinal hernia: a series of 2054 cases. Hemia2000;4:141 e3
  22. http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanua1/9pscssicurrentpdf. accessed on 12/ 08/ 2013
  23. Mauch J, Helbling C, Schlumpf R. [Incarcerated and strangulated hernias-~ surgical approach and management]. Swiss surgery= Schweizer Chirurgie= Chirurgiesuisse= Chirurgiasvizzera. 1999 Dec;6(l):28-3 l.
  24. Kulah B, Kulacoglu 1H, Oruc MT et al. Presentation and outcome of incarcerated external hernias in adults. Am J Surg 2001 Feb;181(2):101-104.
  25. Naeem M, Khan SM, Qayyum A, Jan WA, Jehanzeb M, Mehmood K. Recurrence of inguinal hernia mesh repair. J Postgrad Med Inst 2009; 23: 25457.
  26. Suchitra J LN. Surgical site infections: assessing risk factors, outcomes and antimicrobial sensitivity patterns. Afr J Microbial Res 2009;3:175-9.
  27. Mathur P. Hand hygiene: back to the basics of infection control. Indian J Med Res. Nov;134(5):611-20.
  28. Mahmood Z, Imiran M, Shah TA. Results of open mesh hernioplasty (Lichtenstein) for inguinal hernia: a study of 120 cases at Ghurki Tust Teaching Hospital Lahore. East & Central African Journal of Surgery. 2006;] 1(2):28-34.
  29. Khan N, Naeem M, Bangash A, Asadullah, Sadiq M, Hamid H. Early outcome of Lichtenstein technique of tension-free open mesh repair for inguinal hemia. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008 Oct-Dec;20(4):29-33.
  30. Paajanen H, Varjo R. Ten-year audit of Lichtenstein hernioplasty under local anaesthesia performed by surgical residents. BMC surgery.10(1):24
  31. Khan H, Khan M1, Khan MA. Early postoperative complications of lichtenstein tension free repair of inguinal hernia Ce11.332:9254731
  32. Gianetta E, de Cian F, Cuneo S, et a1. Hernia repair in elderly patients. Br J Surg 1997 Jul;84(7):983-5
  33. Dellinger EP, Ehrankranz NJ. Surgical infections. In Hospital infections, 4thedn. Edited by Bennett JV, Brachmann PS. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 1998.
  34. Suchitra J LN. Surgical site infections: assessing risk factors, outcomes and antimicrobial sensitivity patterns. AfrJ Microbiol Res 2009; 3:175-9
  35. Andrews MJ. Presentation and outcome of strangulated external hernia in a district general hospital. Br. J. Surg. 1981 ;68: 329-32
  36. Amos R, Koontz MD. Femoral hernia: Operative cases at the John Hopkins Hospital during a twenty-one year period. AMA Arch. Surg. 1952; 64: 298306.
  37. Gallegos NC, Dawson J, Jaris M, Hobsley M. Risk of strangulation in groin hernias. Br. J. Surg. 1991; 78: 1171-3.

Corresponding Author

Dr N. Prahalada Reddy

Post Graduate, RIMS, Kadapa