Title: Cytopathological Analysis of Body Fluids in Conventional Smear Method versus Cell Block Method for Diagnostic Evaluation

Authors: Dr Ashok Yadav, Dr Amrita Tripathi, Dr Priyanka Solanki, Dr Upma Gupta

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i12.191

Abstract

Introduction: The cytological analysis of serous effusions helps in diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic implications. The accurate identification of cells as either malignant or reactive mesothelial cells is a diagnostic problem in conventional cytological smears. The cell block (CB) technique is one of the oldest and complementary methods for the evaluation of body cavity fluids.

Methods: The present study was conducted on 130 patients who subjected for the diagnosis of body fluid effusion cytology by CS & CB method. A total 130 fluid specimen were received in the Cytology section, Department of Pathology, M.G.M. Medical College, Indore, (M.P.) from DEC 2015 to DEC 2017. All the 130 body fluid specimens were included in the study.

Results: In our study a total of 130 body cavity fluid samples were studied.  Out of 130 samples, 63 samples were peritoneal fluid, 60 were pleural, 4 were synovial and 3 were pericardial. All the14.6% cases which were malignant on CS remained so on CB. On CB 23.07 % cases were positive for malignancy, 1.5 % suspicious and rest benign & inflammatory. CB increased the yield of malignancy by approx 8.46% (11 cases). Out of these 11 cases, 9 were suspicious on CS and 2 were benign but turned out to be malignant on CB.

Conclusion: In developing countries like India, where health facilities are inadequate, and cost of investigations and management is often unaffordable, fluid analysis and cytology should continue to be the first line of investigation to screen out the benign and malignant effusion cases. A combined use of smears and cell block is recommended to increased further diagnostic accuracy.

References

  1. Koss LG and Melamed MR , (Ed). Koss Diagnostic cytology and its histopathologic bases,5 th edition, JB  Lippincott Company: Philadelphia 922-1016,(2006)
  2. Kushwaha R, Shashikala P, Hiremath S, Basavaraj HG. Cells in pleural fluid and their value in differential diagnosis. J Cytol, 25, 2008, 138-143.
  3. Pradhan S B, Pradhan B, Dali S. Cytology of body fluids from different sites: An approach for early diagnosis of malignancy. J Nepal Med Assoc, 45, 2006, 353-356.
  4. Joshi A, Mahajan N, Karmarkar PJ, Mahore SD. Diagnostic utility of various techniques used in body fluid cytology. IOSR J Med Dent Sci, 13, 2014, 13-18.
  5. Bhanvadia VM, Santwani PM, Vachhani JH. Analysis of diagnostic value of cytological smear method versus cell block method in body fluid cytology: study of 150 cases. Ethiop J Health Sci, 24, 2014, 125-131.
  6. Nathan NA., Narayan E., Smith MM., Horn MJ. Cytology-improved preparation and its efficacy in diagnostic cytology. Am J Clin Pathol, ,114(4):599–606,(2000).
  7. , Dunbar F., Becker PJ., Du Plessis W. Fine Needle cytology: .Is aspiration suction necessary. A study of 100 masses in various sites. Acta Cytol, 33(6): 42-44,(1989).
  8. Kumavat PV, Sulhyan KR, Kulkarni MP. Cytological Study of Effusions. Indian Med Gaz, 147, 2013, 306-313.
  9. Hathila RN, Dudhat RB, Saini PK, Italiya SL, Kaptan KR, Shah MB. Diagnostic importance of serous fluid examination for detection of various pathological conditions - A study of 355 cases. Int J Med Sci Public Health, 2, 2013, 975-979.
  10. Dekker A, Bupp PA. Cytology of serous effusions. An investigation into usefulness of cellblocks versus smear. Am J Clin Pathol, 70, 1978, 855-860.
  11. Pal S, Murmu D, Goswami BK. Ascitic Fluid Cytology in Suspected Malignant Effusions with Special Emphasis on Cell Block Preparation. J Evol Med Dent Sci, 4, 2015, 10488-10493.
  12. Bodele AK, Parate SN, Wadadekar AA, Bobhate SK, Munshi MM. Diagnostic utility of cell block preparation in reporting of fluid cytology. J cytol, 20, 2003, 133-135.
  13. [Thapar M, Mishra RK, Sharma A, Goyal V, Goyal V. Critical analysis of cell block versus smear examination in effusions. J Cytol, 26, 2009, 60-64.
  14. Gayathri MN, Kunal Puri, Satish MK, Ravikumar T, Bharathi M. “Diagnostic utility of cell block method in pleural fluid cytology”. J Evid based Med Healthc, 1, 2014, 1240-1245.

Corresponding Author

Dr Amrita Tripathi

add.- G-133 Parth Avenue App., Shivshakti Nagar, Bicholi Hupsi Road, Indore (M.P), India

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.