Title: Role of High Frequency Ultra-Sonogram & Color Duplex Findings with FNAC in Identifying Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodule

Authors: Dr V Sridhar, Dr M Adaikkappan, Dr M. Dhanalakshmi

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i10.146

Abstract

Introduction: High frequency ultra-sonogram is the best imaging investigation accessible, for the analysis of the thyroid tissue and because of frequent use of ultra-sonogram non palpable thyroid nodules were also identified before symptoms. In this present study I am correlating ultra sound B-Mode grayscale, color and spectral Doppler characteristics of benign versus malignant thyroid nodules with FNAC findings.

Aim: To study the specific B – mode grayscale characteristics, color Doppler and standard reference values of Doppler Resistive index of benign versus malignant thyroid nodules with that of FNAC findings. To assess the specificity and sensitivity of grayscale, color Doppler and FNAC elucidated criteria in differentiating benign from malignant nodules.

Materials and Methodology: We prospectively investigated 60 patients who were referred to our department for thyroid ultra sound investigation from various departments of our institute for thyroid swelling. Every nodule was assessed according to shape, margins, number, echo texture, halo, calcification on grey scale findings and vascularity, RI values on color Doppler findings. All nodules are designated as benign and malignant on the basis of grey scale USG and color Doppler usg findings. Cut off RI values for benign and malignant thyroid nodules by using Receiver operating characteristics curve.

Results: Based on the high frequency ultra-sonogram and color Doppler findings with cross verification with FNAC findings it was found out that out of 60 patients 40 benign, 4 malignant, 15hashimotos thyroiditis and 1 nonspecific thyroiditis. Significant correlation was noted with malignant nodule with following ultra –sonogram features of taller than wider shape, ii-defined margin, markedly hypoechoic, and micro calcification. significant intranodular vascularity and RI values >0.75 was feature of malignant nodules whereas benign nodule showed both intra and peri nodular vascularity and RI values <0.75.high sensitivity and specificity  of diagnosing  malignant nodule combining  both high frequency ultra-sonogram and color Doppler than done either of them alone.

Conclusion: Both high frequency ultra-sonogram and color Doppler findings of thyroid nodule are complimentary in diagnosing malignant and benign nature rather than either of them alone.

Keywords: USG-Ultra-sonogram, FNAC-Fine needle aspiration cytology.

References

  1. Popli MB, Rastogi A, Bhalla P, Solanki Y. Utility of gray-scale ultrasound to differentiate benign from malignant thyroid nodules. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2012;22(1):63-68.
  2. Papini E, Guglielmi R, Bianchini A, Crescenzi A, Taccogna S, Nardi F, et al. Riskof malignancy in nonpalpable thyroid nodules: predictive value of ultrasound and color-Doppler features. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002; 87(5):1941-46.
  3. Bruneton JN, Balu-Maestro C, Marcy PY, Melia P, Mourou MY. Very high frequency (13 MHz) ultrasonographic examination of the normal neck: detection of normal lymph nodes and thyroid nodules. J Ultrasound Med. 1994;13(2):87-90.
  4. Brander AE, Viikinkoski VP, Nickels JI, Kivisaari LM. Importance of thyroidabnor-malities detected at US screening: a 5-year follow-up. Radiology.2000;215(3):801-06.
  5. Algin O, Algin E, Gokalp G, Ocakoğlu G, Erdoğan C, Saraydaroglu O, et al. Roleof duplex power Doppler ultrasound in differentiation between malignant andbenign thyroid nodules. Korean J Radiol. 2010;11(6):594-602.
  6. Ross DS. Nonpalpable thyroid nodules--managing an epidemic. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(5):1938-40.
  7. Maciel RM. Thyroid ultrasound: beyond the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2015;59(6):479-81.
  8. Marqusee E, Benson CB, Frates MC, Doubilet PM, Larsen PR, Cibas ES, et al. Usefulness of ultrasonography in the management of nodular thyroid disease.Ann Intern Med. 2000;133(9):696-700.
  9. Iannuccilli JD, Cronan JJ, Monchik JM. Risk of malignancy of thyroid nodulesas assessed by sonographic criteria: The need for biopsy. J Ultrasound Med. 2004;23(11):1455-64.
  10. Bakhshaee M, Davoudi Y, Mehrabi M, Layegh P, Mirsadaee S, Rad MP, etal. Vascular pattern and spectral parameters of power Doppler ultrasoundas predictors of malignancy risk in thyroid nodules. Laryngoscope.2008;118(12):2182-86.
  11. Xie C, Cox P, Taylor N, LaPorte S. Ultrasonography of thyroid nodules: a pictorialreview. Insights Imaging. 2016;7(1):77-86.
  12. Peccin S, de Castsro JA, Furlanetto TW, Furtado AP, Brasil BA, CzepielewskiMA. Ultrasonography: is it useful in the diagnosis of cancer in thyroid nodules? JEndocrinol Invest. 2002;25(1):39-43.
  13. Frates MC, Benson CB, Charboneau JW, Cibas ES, Clark OH, Coleman BG,et al. Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound. Management of thyroid nodulesdetected at US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conferencestatement. Radiology. 2005;237(3):794-800.
  14. Appetecchia M, Solivetti FM. The association of color flow Doppler sonographyand conventional ultrasonography improves the diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma.Horm Res. 2006;66(5):249-56.
  15. Wienke JR, Chong WK, Fielding JR, Zou KH, Mittelstaedt CA. Sonographicfeatures of benign thyroid nodules: interobserver reliability and overlap withmalignancy. J Ultrasound Med. 2003;22(10):1027-31.
  16. Stacul F, Bertolotto M, De Gobbis F, Calderan L, Cioffi V, Romano A, et al. US,color-Doppler US and fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of thyroidnodules. Radiol Med. 2007;112(5):751-62.
  17. Moon HJ, Kwak JY, Kim MJ, Son EJ, Kim EK. Can vascularity at power Doppler US help predict thyroid malignancy? Radiology. 2010; 255(1): 260-69.
  18. Frates MC, Benson CB, Doubilet PM, Kunreuther E, Contreras M, Cibas ES, et al. Prevalence and distribution of carcinoma in patients with solitary and multiple thyroid nodules on sonography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(9):3411-17.
  19. Chammas MC, Gerhard R, de Oliveira IR, Widman A, de Barros N, Durazzo M, et al. Thyroid nodules: evaluation with power Doppler and duplex Doppler ultrasound. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;132(6):874-82.
  20. Jena A, Patnayak R, Prakash J, Sachan A, Suresh V, Lakshmi AY. Malignancy in solitary thyroid nodule: A clinicoradiopathological evaluation. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2015;19(4):498-503.
  21. Kim EK, Park CS, Chung WY, Oh KK, Kim DI, Lee JT, et al. New sonographic criteria for recommending fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable solid nodules of the thyroid. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178(3):687-91.
  22. Kovacevic DO, Skurla MS. Sonographic diagnosis of thyroid nodules: correlation with the results of sonographically guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. J Clin Ultrasound. 2007; 35(2):63-67.
  23. Koike E, Noguchi S, Yamashita H, Murakami T, Ohshima A, Kawamoto H, et al. Ultrasonographic characteristics of thyroid nodules: prediction of malignancy. Arch Surg. 2001; 136(3):334-37.
  24. Wong KT, Ahuja AT. Ultrasound of thyroid cancer. Cancer Imaging. 2005;5(1):157–66.
  25. Argalia G, D’Ambrosio F, Lucarelli F, Mignosi U, Giuseppetti GM, Passarini G, et al. Echo Doppler in the characterization of thyroid nodular disease. Radiol Med. 1995; 89(5): 651-57.
  26. Tamsel S, Demirpolat G, Erdogan M, Nart D, Karadeniz M, Uluer H, et al. Power Doppler US patterns of vascularity and spectral Doppler US parameters in predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules. ClinRadiol. 2007; 62(3):245-51.
  27. Rosario PW, Silva AL, Borges MA, Calsolari MR. Is Doppler ultrasound of additional value to gray-scale ultrasound in differentiating malignant and benign thyroid nodules? Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2015; 59(1):79-83.
  28. Mohammadi A, Hajizadeh T. Evaluation of diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound scoring system to select thyroid nodules requiring fine needle aspiration biopsy. Int J ClinExp Med. 2013; 6(8):641-48.
  29. De Nicola H, Szejnfeld J, Logullo AF, Wolosker AM, Souza LR, Chiferi V. Flow pattern and vascular resistive index as predictors of malignancy risk in thyroid follicular neoplasms. J Ultrasound Med. 2005; 24(7): 897-904.
  30. Ivanac G, Brkljacic B, Ivanac K, Huzjan R, Skreb F, Cikara I. Vascularisation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: CD US evaluation. Ultraschall Med. 2007; 28(5): 502-06.

Corresponding Author

Dr V Sridhar

Resident, Department of Radio-diagnosis, Rajah Muthiah Medical College and Hospital, Annamalai University, Chidambaram