Title: A Study of Benign and Malignant Lesions of Prostate in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Authors: Dr Rahul V. Taksande, Dr Jagruti C. Gokhale, Dr Sameer A. H Ansari, Dr Aniket M. Jadhav

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i8.180

Abstract

Background: Prostatic disease is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality in men throughout the world. The current study is undertaken to assess the spectrum of tumors affecting the prostate and the utility of clinical and pathological correlation in the diagnosis of the same.

Material and Methods: The present study was done on 174 cases of various lesions of the prostate over a period of 5 years in the Department of Pathology. All the prostatic specimens were subjected to a careful and detailed gross examination. 10% formalin fixed and paraffin embedded tissue sections from these specimens were used for microscopic study

Result: Out of the 174 cases of the various lesions of the prostate, 164[94.26%] cases were benign and 7 [4.02%] cases were malignant.

Conclusions: Histopathology plays a pivitol role in diagnosing prostatic lesions, classifying them in to benign, and malignant and to study the salient features of each lesions.

Keywords:  neoplasm, prostrate, hyperplasia, malignancy, biopsy.

References

  1. Jonathan I Epstein. The prostate & seminal vesicles. In: Sternberg’s Diagnostic Surgincal Pathology. 5th Vol II, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.p. 1870-1913.
  2. Jewett H.J. Significance of the palpable prostatic nodule. JAMA, 1956;160 : 838-839.
  3. G. Matapurkar and O.P. Taneja, Incidence of Carcinoma Prostate. The Indian Journal of Cancer, 1969 Sep;6(3):172-83.
  4. Chitali A.R. and Vadnera V. In pathology of urinary and male genital systems, chapter on diseases of prostate gland. B.I. Churchill Livingstone, pp. 127-168, 1992
  5. Mansoor: Pattern of prostatic diseases in Saudi Arabia. The Internet Journal of Pathology, 2003: Volume 2 Number 2. DOI:10.5580/185f.
  6. .A Z Mohammed, EJC Nwana, AS Anjorin. Histological pattern of prostatic diseases in Nigerians. African Journal of Urology, 2005; 11(1): 33-38.
  7. Sadia Hameed, Akram Malik, Saira Bilal, Shahid Riaz Dogar, Shazia Aslam. Pattern Of Prostatic Disease: A Histopathological Survey. Professional Med J Dec 2010; 17(4): 573-577.
  8. Muhammed Abrar Barakzai, Muhammed Mubarak, Javed Iqbal Kazi. Histopathological Lesions in transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies of prostate in patients With raised serum prostate specific antigen: A preliminary report. Nephro-Urol. Mon. 2011;3(3): 186-190.
  9. CC Obiorah, SO Nwosu. A histopatho-logical study of carcinoma of the prostate in port Harcourt, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. Jul-Sep 2001; 14(3): 363367.
  10. .Moore R.A. Benign Hypertrophy of the Prostate. J. Uro., 1943;50:680-710.
  11. C. Sharma, S.C. Mathur, M.L. Sharma. Occult carcinoma in benign hypertrophy of the prostate. Indian Journal of Surgery. April 1972:p. 152-155.
  12. Birkhoff J.D. Wiederhorn A.R., Hamilton M.L., Zinssser H.H. Natural History of Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy And Acute Urinary Retention Urol. January 1976; VII(1): 48-52.
  13. Keuhnelian J.G. et al. Experiences with granulomatous prostate. J. Urol., 1964; 91:173.
  14. Mohan H. Bal A, Punia RP, Bawa AS. Granulomatous prostatitis – an infrequent diagnosis. Int J. Urol., 2005, May; 12(5): 474-8.
  15. Kelalis P.P. et al. Granulomatous prostatitis. A mimic of carcinoma of the prostate. JAMA, 1965; 191: 287
  16. Nusret Akpolat, Yalcin Buyuk, Ibrahim Uzun, Ilhan Gecit, Gulay Kurnaz. Prevalence of latent prostate cancer and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in Istanbul, Turkey: an autopsy study. Turk J. Med Sci 2012;42(3):449-456.
  17. Ghartimager, R. Naik, A. Gupta, A. Ghosh Histopathology of Prostatic Lesions-An Autopsy Study of 100 Cases. The Internet Journal Of Forensic Science 2012;5(1).
  18. Bauer W.C., Mac Gavran M.H. Carlin M.R. Unsuspected carcinoma of the prostate in suprapubic prostatectomy specimens. Cancer, 1960;13(2): 370-378.
  19. Bhajekar A.B., Bhat H.S., Rao M.M. Diagnostic approach to carcinoma of prostate. Ind. J.Surg. 1963;25:563-570.
  20. Robin T. Vollmer. Prostate cancer and chip specimens: Complete versus patial sampling. Hum. Pathol., 1986;17(3):285-290.
  21. Aboul Nasr. Cancer of the prostate gland. Indian J. Cacner. 1966 Mar;3(1):13.22.
  22. Godwin Ifere, Fisseha Abebe, Godwin A Ananada. Emergent trends in the reported incidence of Prostate Cancer in Nigeria. Clinical Epidemiology, 2012;4:19-32.
  23. Gaynor E.P. et al. Zur frage de prostatakrebes. Quoted in Peterson’s Urologic Pathology, 1982.
  24. Frank D. Gilliland and Charles R. Key. Male genital cancers. Cancer, 1995;75: 295-315.
  25. Edqared C.N., Steinthorsson E, Nicholson D. An autopsy study of latent prostatic cancer. Cancer, 1953;6: 531.
  26. Bean, Ryuichi, Yatani et al. Prostatic Carcinoma At Autopsy In Hiroshima And Nagasaki Japanese. Cancer, 1960;32:498.
  27. Babaian JR, Johnston AD, Naccarato W, Ayala A, Bhadkamkar AV, Fritsche AH. The incidence of prostate cancer in a screening population with a serum prostate specific antigen between 2.5 and 4.0 ng/ml. Relation to Biopsy Strategy. J Urol., 2001;165:757-760.
  28. Mawakyoma H A, Mabandi J L. Prostate cancer; Correlation of gleason’s score and pretreatment prostate specific antigen in patients. Professional Med J Jun 2010;17(2):235-240.

Corresponding Author

Dr Sameer A.H Ansari

Assistant Professor, Dept of Pathology, Grant Govt Medical College, Mumbai 400008 India

Mobile: 9322804424, Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.