Title: Suture rectopexy in the Management of Rectal prolapse in adults

Authors: Dr Nagesh.N.S., Dr Dharmendra.B.L

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i8.141

Abstract

Complete rectal prolapse is a circumferential full thickness descent of the rectum, which should be differentiated from prolapsing hemorrhoids, one of the common surgical problems we encounter which were treated by either abdominal approach or perineal approach with numerous variations in the technique.

It is a Retrospective study including cases operated for Rectal prolapse in the Department of surgical Gastroenterology from 2005 to 2015, a total of 58 cases operated for rectal prolapsed with abdominal approach, The operative procedures performed were Laparoscopic suture rectopexy (44), Lap converted open suture rectopexy (13), Open suture rectopexy(1), Re-do resection rectopexy (2), perineal repairs were excluded from the study

There were 58 cases operated totally and 44 Laparoscopic suture rectopexy and 13 Lap converted open rectopexy one case of open rectopexy. Most common symptom was H/O mass per anum, irreducible mass in 10cases, constipation in 10 cases, Hospital stay post operatively was longer for lap converted open and open rectopexy compared to laparoscopic rectopexy, complications include pelvic abscess, recurrent partial prolapse, Two cases of redo resection rectopexy, for post op persistent constipation in one case and sigmoid perforation in other case, no immediate mortality observered.

Posterior mobilization with Laparoscopic suture rectopexy is an effective and simple treatment for the complete rectal prolapse, it can be advocated in all patients fit for surgery which has lesser hospital stay and early recovery

Keywords: laparoscopic rectopexy, suture rectopexy, Posterior mobilization

References

  1. Christopher Harmston, Oliver Jones , The evolution of laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse, International Journal of Surgery 9 (2011) 370-373.
  2. D’Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 2004;91(11):1500-5.
  3. Solomon MJ, Young CJ, Eyers AA, Roberts RA. Randomized clinical trial oflaparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 2002;89(1):35-39.
  4. Graf W, Karlbom U, Pahlman L, Nilsson S, Ejerblad S. Functional results after abdominal suture rectopexy for rectal prolapse or intussusception. Eur J Surg 1996;162(11):905-11.
  1. Yeo CJ. Shackelford’s Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 6th Philadelphia, Saunders Elsevier: 2002
  2. Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL. Sabiston Textbook of Surgery- The biological basis of modern surgical practice 20th Philadelphia, Saunders Elsevier: 2017
  3. Von Papen M, Ashari LH, Lumley JW, Stevenson AR, Stitz RW. Functional results of laparoscopic resection rectopexy for symptomatic rectal intussusceptions. Dis colon Rectum 2007:50(1):50-5
  4. Ashari LH, Lumley JW, Stevenson AR, Stitz RW. Laparoscopically-assisted resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse; ten years experience. Dis colon Rectum 2005:48(5):50-5.

Corresponding Author

Dr Dharmendra.B.L

No 217, 4th cross, Nimishamba Layout, Kuvempunagar, Mysore 570023, India

Mobile no:9844400382, Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.