Title: A comparative ultrasonic study of prostate gland

Authors: Niharika Padhy, Rajalaxmi Panda

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i8.89

Abstract

Background: BPH is a common disorder among elderly males. There is a strong suspicion that the prevalence of BPH is higher than has been reported in clinical retrospective and necroscopy studies. For its deep topographic position in the pelvic cavity the prostate is inaccessible for diagnostic evaluation other than through urethra   or rectum more precisely. In the present days ultrasonic technique is suitable for the precise measurement of the size of various organs.  

Aim: To assess prostatic size in relation to some clinical conditions by Abdominal Contact Scanning (PAUS) or Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS).

Materials and Methods: this retrospective study comprises of 154 cases of which 60 cases without any urinary symptoms were taken as controls in contrast to 94 cases showing urinary symptoms. All the cases were subjected through either Abdominal Contact Scanning(PAUS) or Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS). Various dimensions of prostate were applied to the study.

Result: All the prostatic dimension are increased in obstructive and irritative urinary symptoms. The Transverse diameter plays a greater role than Antero-Posterior diameter in obstruction.

Keywords: prostate, prostatic weight, C-C diameter, AP diameter, Tr diameter.

References

  1. Garaway, W.M.: benign prostatic hyperplasia: effect on quality of life and impact on treatment decisions urology 44:629.1994
  2. Chandanwale S: clinic-pathological study of benign & malignant lesions o prostate, IJPBS |Volume 3| Issue 1|JAN MAR |2013| 162 -178.
  3. Meyhoff H. H: are doctors able to assess prostate size-scan J urolNephrol,12:219-21, 1978
  4. Breslow N: latent carcinoma of prostate at autopsy at seven areas. Int. J. Comm. 20:680-688,1975.
  5. Watanabe H: transrectal ultrasonography of the prostate J. Urol114: 734-739, 1975
  6. Miller S.S: the evaluation of prostate size by ultrasonic scanning. A preliminary report- Br. J. Urol45: 187-191, 1973.
  7. Watanabe H: ultrasonographic diagnosis of the prostate. Transperineal contact scanning Med, ultrasonics11 in press, 1973
  8. Eri LM: Accuracy and repeatability of prostate volume measurements by transrectal ultrasound. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases 5(4):273-8February 2002. Researchgate.
  9. Kaye K.W : ultrasonographic anatomy of normal prostate gland: reconstruction by computer graphics, urology, 35: 12, 1990
  10. Masumari N: age related difference in internal prostatic architecture on transrectal ultrasonography: result of a community based survey in Japan J. Urol 157-1718, 1997.
  11. Watanabe H et al: measurement of size and weight of prostate by means of transrectal ultrasonography. Tohuku. J. Exp. Med 114:277-285;1974.
  12. Berry et al: The development of human benign prostatic hyperplasia with age; J. Urol: 132:474; 1984.
  13. Castro J.E et al: Significance of signs and symptoms in BPH. Brit. Med. J. 2: 598;1969.
  14. Zhang SJ: Relation between age and prostate size, Asian J Androl. 2013 Jan; 15(1): 116–120.

Corresponding Author

Rajalaxmi Panda

Associate Professor, Dept of Anatomy, M.K.C.G. Medical College, Berhampur. 760004 Odisha, India

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.