Title: Sociodemographic Profile and Outcome of Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes

Authors: Dr Anuradha Chakravartty, Dr Plabon Basu, Dr S.M. Tushar Alom, Dr Farah Anjum Sonia

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i8.82

Abstract

Introduction: Premature rupture of membrane (PROM) is connected to noteworthy maternal pre-birth mortalities and morbidity. The result of maternal and fetal in PROM is imperative to diminish maternal and child mortality and for better administration and anticipation of complexities. Premature rupture of membrane (PROM) refers to the interruption of fetal layers previously the start of work, bringing about unconstrained spillage of amniotic liquid. PROM, which happens before 37 weeks of incubation, characterized as preterm PROM as PROM, happens following 37 weeks growth characterized as term PROM. The etiology of PROM is accepted to be multifactorial and several risk factors have been distinguished. Factors incorporate multigravida, low socio-economic status, concomitant infection e.g. UTI, vulvovaginitis, anaemia,  past the point of no return introduction of side effects, H/O Polyhydramnios, irregular ANC, low socio-economic status and a background marked by preterm PROM of preterm work. There is scarcity of information on clinical profile and result of PROM in tertiary focal point of Bangladesh, so as to address this issues, this examination was intended to explore the clinical profile and result of pregnancy of untimely break of layer (PROM). Diagnosis and proper management is critical to confine different fetal and maternal complexities for the most part because of disease. Hence, this investigation means to decide maternal and fetal results in PROM among term pregnant ladies who were admitted to the maternity or work ward in Hospital.

Objectives: To determine the sociodemographic Profile and feto-maternal outcome of Preterm premature rupture of membrane (PROM).

Materials and Methods: This is cross sectional observational study; amongst 50 women with H/O PPROM were included in this study. Sociodemographic attributes were evaluated. Ruptures of membrane with an APH, serve pre- eclampsia, eclampsia, malpresentation were excluded from study.

Result: Sociodemographic highlights, e.g., age, habitation, occupation, financial status, and so forth are the prime determinants of result of PROM. In this study, the age of the patients went between 17->35 years, mean age was 23.5 ± 9.54 years. Vast quantities of respondents originated from urban region 53.0%, and financially poor class 26(52%). The vast majority of the ladies were multigravida (62%). Around 74.2% were analyzed around 34-37 week of development. Introduction of PROM or span of side effects went from 40 minutes to most extreme 2 days. The greatest country amass patients displayed after beginning of side effects >12 hours i.e. 8(42.11%) patients. The postponement in hospitalization increases the intensifying of ailment process and improvement of entanglement, at last poorer result. On the other hand patients hailing from urban dwelling hospitalized at the earliest opportunity after sign-manifestations improvement. On evaluation of pregnancy outcome, study shows that most of the PROM women conveyed by LUCS (82.0%). Most normal complication was subclinical urogenital infection (36.0%) next oligohydramnios (32.0%) and (16.0%) women presented with chorioamnionitis. Among the infants, 26% had Apgar score beneath 7 at their first min of age and 10% had Apgar score underneath 7 at their 5 min of age. Birth asphyxia was been developed in total 6 newborn. Hospital admission to released, legitimate workup and assessment was performed in all patients. Overall result demonstrates that 92.0% of the PROM women recouped either totally or partially, 8.0% remains stop; it might be because of wound disease or other fundamental ailment. Besides, maternal mortality happened. However, 37(74.0%) of neonates recovered during hospital stay, yet 11(22.0%) built up any difficulties and till were hospitalized under neonatal care. Two patients were expired. So, neonatal death rate was 2(4.0%) subject in this study.

Conclusion: Women living in rural areas, lower class, long latency, and neonates with birth weight less than 2500 g may have adverse outcomes. In this case, optimum obstetric and medical care is essential for the diminishment of the staggering inconveniences related to disorders.

Keywords: PROM, Preterm PROM, Demogrpaphic features, Outcome.

References

  1. Chakraborty B, Mandal T, Chakraborty S. Outcome of Prelabor Rupture of Membranes in a Tertiary Care Center in West Bengal. Indian Journal of Clinical Practice, 2013; Vol. 24, No. 7:657-662.
  2. Borna S, Borna H, khazardoost S and Hantoushzadeh S. Perinatal outcome in preterm premature rupture of membranes with Amniotic fluid index < 5 (AFI < 5). BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2004, 4:15
  3. Okeke TC, Enwereji JO, Okoro OS, Adiri CO, Ezugwu EC, and Agu PU, “The Incidence and Management Outcome of Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes (PPROM) in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria.” American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research 2, no. 1 (2014): 14-17.
  4. Hyagriv N. Simhan, Timothy P. Canavan. Preterm premature rupture of membranes: diagnosis, evaluation and management strategies. BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, March 2005, Vol. 112, Supplement 1, pp. 32–37.
  5. Shrestha S and Sharma P. Fetal outcome of pre-labor rupture of membranes. N. J. Obstet. Gynaecol, 2006; Vol. 1, No. 2: 19 -24.
  6. Mohr T. Premature rupture of the membranes. Gynakol Geburtsmed Gynakol Endokrinol 2009; 5(1):28–36.
  7. Alexander JM, Mercer BM, Miodovnik M, Thurnau GR, Goldenburg RL, Das AF, et al. The impact of digital cervical examination on expectantly managed preterm rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 1003-1007
  8. Arias F, Daftary SN, Bhide AG. Premature Rupture of Membrane, Practical Guide to HighRisk Pregnancy & Delivery , A South Asian Perspective, 3rd edition-2008; 240-261.
  9. Okeke TC, Enwereji JO, Okoro OS, Adiri CO, Ezugwu EC, and Agu PU, “The Incidence and Management Outcome of Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes (PPROM) in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria.” American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research 2, no. 1 (2014): 14-17.
  10. Preterm Prelabour Rupture of Membranes. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Green–top Guideline No. 44, November 2006:2-12.
  11. Borna S, Borna H, khazardoost S and Hantoushzadeh S. Perinatal outcome in preterm premature rupture of membranes with Amniotic fluid index < 5 (AFI < 5). BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2004, 4:15
  12. Hyagriv N. Simhan, Timothy P. Canavan. Preterm premature rupture of membranes: diagnosis, evaluation and management strategies. BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, March 2005, Vol. 112, Supplement 1, pp. 32–37.
  13. Shrestha S and Sharma P. Fetal outcome of pre-labor rupture of membranes. N. J. Obstet. Gynaecol, 2006; Vol. 1, No. 2: 19 -24.
  14. Nazneen S, Begum F, Nargis S. Premature Rupture of Membrane - A Clinical Study In Comilla Medical College Hospital. Bangladesh J Obstet Gynaecol, 2013; Vol. 28(2) : 82-87
  15. Usha R. Krishna and Monisa H.Shah. Prelabour Rupture of Membranes, Obstetrics and Gynecology for Postgraduates, edited by S.S. Ratnam, K. Bhasker Rao and S. Arulkumaran, 2nd edition-1999; Vol-1, 96-108
  16. Begum N; Epidemiology of Premature Rupture of Membrane and Management in Rangpur Medical College Hospital. Dissertation; Bangladesh College of Physicians and Surgeons, 2004.
  17. Okeke TC, Enwereji JO, Okoro OS, Adiri CO, Ezugwu EC, and Agu PU, “The Incidence and Management Outcome of Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes (PPROM) in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria.” American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research 2, no. 1 (2014): 14-17.
  18. Romero R, Yoon BH, Mazor M, et al. A comparative study of the diagnostic performance of amniotic fluid glucose, white cell count, interleukin-6 and Gram stain in the detection of microbial invasion in patients with preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 839-51.
  19. Arias F, Tomich PH. Etiology and outcome of low birth weight and preterm infants. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 60: 277-81.

Corresponding Author

Dr Anuradha Chakravartty

Assistant Professor, Ad-din Sakina Medical College, Jessore, Bangladesh