Title: Comparison of Intrathecal Bupivacaine with or without Buprenorphine for Postoperative Pain Relief in Caesarean Section

Author: Dr Letha. J, MD, DA

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i8.10

Abstract

Background: Intrathecal route of administration has the advantage of greater technical ease, lower dose requirement and more selective analgesia. Intrathecal Bupivacaine with Buprenorphine seems to be an ideal combination of this purpose. This study was conducted to compare the effects of intrathecal Bupivacaine alone and its combination with Buprenorphine to assess the extent of postoperative pain relief in caesarean section patients.

Materials and Methods: Fifty patients were divided into two groups of twenty-five each. Group I received 10 mg of 0.5% heavy Bupivavacine with 1μg/kg of preservative free Buprenorphine upto a maximum of 60 μg intrathecally and Group II received 10 mg of 0.5% heavy Bupivacaine alone intrathecally.

Statistical Analysis used: To compare the statistical difference in various parameters, the arithmetic mean and standard deviation were calculated. The comparison between the two groups were accomplished using the student’s two sample “t” test.

Results: The onset of analgesia was considerably shorter in Group I than Group II. The duration of postoperative analgesia was significantly longer in Group I than in Group II. No major side effects or respiratory depression were observed in the study. However the mild side effects observed such as drowsiness, nausea and vomiting raise an element of caution.

Conclusion: From the present study it is evident that intrathecal Buprenorphine in a dose of 1 μg/kg in combination with Bupivacaine offers a simple, inexpensive, effective and safe means of good quality postoperative analgesia.

Keywords: Bupivacaine , Buprenorphine, Postoperative analgesia, Intrathecal, Caesarean.

References

  1. Ready L.B. Acute Postoperative Pain In; Miller Anesthesia.1994: 2328-2338.
  2. Bailey, Stanley, Intravenous opioid Anesthetics in Miller RD Anaesthesia; 1994:297:310
  3. Yaksh Spinal opiate analgesia: characteristics and principle of action. Pain 1981: 11:293
  4. Sinatra, Spinal and epidural opioids in Tinker and Morgan ; principles and practice Anesthesiology : Moby yearbook 1998:64:1511-1535.
  5. D Kumar, Dev Gupta, Comparitive study of epidural buprenorphine and Ketamine for postoperative pain relief: Ind J. Anesth 1997: (41). 38
  6. Singh C, Saxena A, Spinal Anesthesia with Bupivacaine and Fentanyl. J Anesthesia Clin. Pharmacol.1999, 15(3): 291-294
  7. Kiran, Kaul, Single dose epidural buprenorphine for pain relief in day care surgery. Ind. J. Anesthesia. 1992 :40:117
  8. Capogna, Intrathecal buprenorphine for postoperative analgesia Clin.pharmacol. Ther :1988 :335-342
  9. Dahm OP, Intrathecal infusion of bupivacaine with or without Buprenorphine relieved intractable pain in patients with vertebral compression fractures caused byosteoporosis. Regional Anesthesia and pain medicine : 1999: 15(3): 291-294
  10. Bromage PR. Epidural narcotics for postoperative analgesia. Anesth, Analog, 1980 : 59,473-480
  11. Development of an anesthesiology based postoperative pain management service; Raedy LB. Anesthesiology 1998 :68:100
  12. Scott, Intraspinal opiates itching: a new reflex? Br.Med. J 1982 :284:1015
  13. Non respiratory side effects of epidural morphine; Bromage, Anesth.Anal : 1982:61:490-495
  14. Opioids: Pharmacology in relation to anesthesia and post operative pain control . Robert and Brown International practice of Anesthesia :1996 : 1:18: 2-3.

Corresponding Author

Dr Letha. J, MD, DA

Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Govt.T.D. Medical College, Alappuzha, India