Title: Cytomorphological Spectrum of Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Liver Lesions, and the Role of Cell Block Preparation and Immunohistochemistry in the Diagnosis: An Analysis of 638 Consecutive Aspirations
Authors: Renu Sukumaran, Nileena Nayak, Jayasree Katoor, Sindhu Nair P, Anila KR, Venugopal M
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i4.145
Abstract
The differential diagnoses of space occupying lesions (SOL) of the liver are wide. It ranges from infectious and inflammatory processes to benign and malignant liver lesions which include primary and metastatic tumors. As the clinical, biochemical and imaging modalities have limitations in the accurate diagnosis, fine needle aspiration cytology places an important role in the categorization of liver SOL. The diagnostic difficulties encountered in FNAC are reduced by the use of cell block preparation and immunohistochemistry.
Aims and Objectives: To evaluate the spectrum of liver lesions, to study the cytological features of SOL of the liver and to evaluate the role of cell block preparation and immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis.
Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of the FNA slides of hepatic lesions during a period of three years from 2014 to 2016 was performed. The slides were studied for detailed cytological features and categorized into adequate, inadequate and inconclusive. The usefulness of cell block preparation and immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis were evaluated.
Results: A total of 638 liver aspirations were evaluated. 438 were adequate, 69 were inadequate and 131 were inconclusive. The age of the patients ranged from 0 to 88 years. Among the 438 adequate aspirations, 301 were metastatic. 250 cases were metastatic adenocarcinoma. Metastasis from squamous cell carcinoma, small cell carcinoma, neuroendocrine tumor, neuroblastoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor and sarcoma were also encountered. There were 98 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma. Trabecular growth pattern, endothelial cuffing, macronucleoli, multinucleation and intranuclear inclusions were the most frequent findings in HCC. Cell block preparation was done in 107 cases. In nine cases, where the FNA was inconclusive, cell block preparation alone helped in making morphological diagnosis thus avoiding the need for a repeat procedure. IHC was done in cell block preparation of 66 cases which helped in the differentiation between well differentiated HCC from benign hepatic proliferations and poorly differentiated HCC from metastatic adenocarcinoma, to know the primary site of metastatic adenocarcinoma and to diagnose uncommon tumors.
Conclusion: In this study, we had a wide spectrum of liver lesions. The main diagnostic difficulties encountered were to differentiate well differentiated HCC from benign hepatic proliferations and poorly differentiated HCC from metastatic adenocarcinoma. Detailed cytological evaluation along with cell block preparation and subsequent IHC helped in the diagnosis.
Keywords: cell block, fine needle aspiration cytology, immunohistochemistry, liver lesions
References
- Ramdas A, Chopra R. Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology of liver lesions. J Cytol2003;20:121-3.
- Swamy M, Arathi C , Kodandaswamy C . Value of ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration cytology in the investigative sequence of hepatic lesions with an emphasis on hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cytol2011;28:178-84
- Shah A, Jain GM. Fine needle aspiration cytology of the liver- A study of 518 cases.JCytol 2002;19:139-43.
- Coyhan K, Kupana SA, Bektas M, Cobar S, Tuzun A, CinarK,etal.The diagnostic value of on-site cytomorphological evaluation and cell block preparation in fine needle aspiration cytology of liver masses. Cytopathology 2006;17:267-74.
- Ahuja A, Gupta N, Srinivasan R, Kalra N, Chawla Y, Rajwanshi A. Differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma from metastatic carcinoma of the liver - clinical and cytological features. J Cytol2007;24:125-9
- Barbhuiya M, Bhunia S, Kakkar M, Shrivastava B, Tiwari PK, Gupta S. Fine needle aspiration cytology of lesions of liver and gall bladder: An analysis of 400 consecutive aspirations. J Cytol 2014;31: 20-4.
- Rasania A, Pandey CL, Joshi N. Evaluation of FNAC in diagnosis of hepatic lesion. J Cytol2007;24:51-4.
- Ali SR, Jayabackthan L, Rahim S, Sharel MB, Prasad K, Hegdekatte N. Role of fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of hepatic lesions. Muller J Med Sci Res 2015;6:125-8
- Wee A, Nilsson B. Highly well differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma and benign hepatocellular lesions. Can they be distinguished on fine needle aspiration biopsy? ActaCytol2003;47:16-26.
- Cohen MB, Haber MM, Holly EA, Ahn DK, Bottles K, Stoloff AC. Cytologic criteria to distinguish hepatocellular carcinoma from nonneoplastic liver. Am J ClinPathol 1991; 95: 125-30.
- Greene CA, Suen KC. Some cytologic features of hepatocellular carcinoma as seen in fine needle aspirates. ActaCytol 1984; 28: 713-8.
- Soyuer I, Ekinci C, Kaya M, Genc Y, Bahar K. Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma by fine needle aspiration cytology. Cellular features. Acta Cytol 2003;47:581-9.
- Sheefa H, Lata J, Basharat M, Rumana M, Veena M, Utility of FNAC in conjunction with cell block for diagnosing space- occupying lesion (SOL) of liver with emphasis on differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from metastatic SOL: Analysis of 61 cases. Oman Med J 2016;31:135-41.