Details
Category: Volume 05 Issue 12 December 2017
Hits: 1503

Title: The Knowledge and Preference of Postendodontic Restorations: A Survey study among General Practitioners in Governmental Universities

Authors: Sultanah Al Mobarak, Alhanouf Alshamsan, Lama Alghufaily, Nouf Alsalem, Nourah Alfuraih, Sarah Albluwi, Shahad Aladhyani, Amal Sakr, Neamat Abu-bakr

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i12.77

Abstract

Introduction

Endodontic therapy is the removal of irreversibly inflamed or necrotic pulp tissue from the root canals. Future contamination of the endodotically treated teeth is a major and primary concern because of the high chance of oral cavity contamination to invade the tooth after Endodontic treatment which can be prevented by restoring the tooth immediately with no delays. The placement of this restoration returns the tooth to normal function and esthetic and maintain it against any further destruction as it becomes weaker after the pulp removal. Due to structural and morphological differences between vital and non-vital root-filled teeth, restoration of these endodontically treated teeth can be challenging.(2) consequently, the quality of both endodontic treatment and tooth restoration have a heavy influence on the treatment outcome and prognosis. Recently coronal restorations of the teeth are rapidly growing and increasing in number, making the decision of choice more difficult to the dentist to obtain a restoration with a good quality to reach the maximum effectiveness. The choice of restoration depends on several situations and factors including mainly the amount of remaining tooth and the type of tooth and this requires special considerations(6) emphasizing that the prognosis of endodontically treated teeth is largely influenced by the postendodontic restoration and not only the endodontic procedure its self (7-9).

References

  1. Spielman, H., Schaffer, S., Cohen, M., Wu, H., Vena, D., Collie, D., Curro, F., Thompson, V. and Craig, R. (2012). Restorative outcomes for endodontically treated teeth in the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning Network.The Journal of the American Dental Association, 143(7), pp.746-755.
  2. Sequeira-Byron, P., Fedorowicz, Z., Alrowaili, E., Nasser, M. and Carter, B. (2015). Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root-filled teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev., 25(9).
  3. Chadwick J, Gonzales A, McLean C, Naghavi A, Rosati S, Yau S. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: An evidence based literature review. Unive-rsity of Toronto, Faculty of Dentistry- Community, Dentistry 2008;1–21.
  4. Heydecke G, Butz F, Hussein A, Strub JR. Fracture strength after dynamic loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002 Apr;87(4): 438–45.
  5. Fedorowicz Z, Carter B, de Souza RF, Chaves CA, Nasser M, Sequeira-Byron P. Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root filled teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012 May;16(5):CD009109
  6. kon, M., zitzmann, N., weiger, R. and krastl, G. (2013). Postendodontic restorat-ion: a survey among dentists in Switzerland.Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed, 123(12), pp.1076-88.
  7. Ray H A, Trope M. Periapical Status of Endodonti- cally Treated Teeth in Relation to the Techni- cal Quality of the Root Filling and the Coro- nal Restoration. Int Endod J 28: 12–18 (1995)
  8. Lynch C D, Burke F M, Ni R R, Hannigan A.The In- fluence of Coronal Restoration Type on the Survival of Endodontically Treated Teeth. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 12: 171–176 (2004)
  9. Tronstad L, Asbjornsen K, Doving L, Pedersen I, Eriksen H M. Influence of Coronal Restorations on the Periapical Health of Endodontically Treated Teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 16: 218–221 (2000)
  10. Akbar I. Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice of Restoring Endodontically Treated Teeth by Dentists in North of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Health Sciences. 2015;9(1):41-49.
  11. Naumann, M., Blankenstein, F., Kießling, S. and Dietrich, T. (2005). Risk factors for failure of glass fiber-reinforced composite post restorations: a prospective observa-tional clinical study. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 113(6), pp.519-524.
  12. Aquilino, S. and Caplan, D. (2002). Relationship between crown placement and the survival of endodontically treated teeth. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 87(3), pp.256-263.
  13. Nagasiri R, Chitmongkolsuk S. (2005). Long-Term Survival of Endodontically Treated Molars without Crown Coverage: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry93( 2 ), pp. 164–170 .
  14. Jung R E, Kalkstein O, Sailer I, Roos M, Hämmerle C H. (2007).A Comparison of Composite Post Buildups and Cast Gold Post-and-Core Buildups for the Restoration of Nonvital Teeth after 5 to 10 Years. The International Journal of Prosthodontics.20 (1), pp: 63–69.
  15. VȦrlan C, Dimitriu B, VȦrlan V, Bodnar D, Suciu I. Current opinions concerning the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: basic principles. Journal of Medicine and Life. 2009;2(2):165-172.

Corresponding Author

Sultanah Al Mobarak

General Dentist, Department of Clinical Dental Science,

College of Dentistry, PNU