##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
There has been an increase in the number of services available in the internet .Datasets are growing at a fast pace as it is being gathered and generated by a number of devices like smartphones, tablets and various information sensing devices. Traditional data processing methods are ineffective in handling such a huge amount of data related to services within limited time constraints. Most of the present day recommendation systems use structured data. In order to handle the large amount of data relevant to the services and assist a user in selecting a service which is most relevant a collaborative filtering based recommender system is proposed which uses unstructured data. There are three stages in this method. In the first stage porters stemming algorithm is applied ,then clustering is applied on the data, in order to reduce the number of services, in the last stage a filtering approach is used in order to recommend relevant services to the user. As stemming and clustering are applied before filtering recommendations are done at a faster pace.
Keywords: stemming, clustering, collaborative filtering, pearson coefficient, recommender system.##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
References
2. X. Wu, X. Zhu, G. Q. Wu, and W. Ding, ``Data mining with big data,'' IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 97107, Jan. 2014.
3. A. Rajaraman and J. D. Ullman, Mining of Massive Datasets. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012
4. A. BellogÃn, I. Cantador, F. DÃez, P. Castells, and E. Chavarriaga, `an empirical comparison of social, collaborative filtering, and hybrid recommenders,'' ACM Trans. Intel. Syst. Technol., vol. 4, no. 1,Jan. 2013.
5. Hybrid Recommender Systems: Survey and Experiments†Robin Burke California State University, Fullerton,2013.
6. A. BellogÃn, I. Cantador, F. DÃez, P. Castells, and E. Chavarriaga, ‘an empirical comparison of social, collaborative filtering, and hybrid recommenders,'' ACM Trans. Intel. Syst. Technol., vol. 4, no. 1, Jan. 2013.
7. Applicability of Demographic Recommender System to Tourist Attractions: A Case Study on Trip Advisor, Yuan yuan Wang ; Dept. of Compute., Hong Kong Polytechnic. Univ., Hong Kong, China ,2014.
8. Using Content-Based Filtering for Recommendation, Robin van Meteren1 and Maarten van Someren2,Jan 2013.
9. Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems by Michael D. Ekstrand, John T. Riedl and Joseph A. Konstan, June 2014.
10. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems, Jonathan L Herlocker, John T.Riedl, and June 2012.
11. Z. Zheng, J. Zhu, and M. R. Lye, ``Service-generated big data and big data as-a-service: An overview,'' in Proc. IEEE Int. Conger. Big Data, Oct. 2013
12. Porter M.F. “An algorithm for suffix strippingâ€. Program. 1980; 14, 130-137.
13. Porter M.F. “Snowball: A language for stemming algorithmsâ€. 2001.
14. Y. Zhao, G. Karis, and U. Fayyad, ``Hierarchical clustering algorithms for document datasets,'' Data Mining Knowl. Discovery, vol. 10, no. 2,Nov. 2005.
15. Mai, Y. Fan, and Y. Shen, ``A neural networks-based clustering collaborative filtering algorithm in e-commerce recommendation system,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Web Inf. Syst. Mining, pp. 616619, Jun. 2013.
16. J. Wu, L. Chen, Y. Feng, Z. Zheng, M. C. Zhou, and Z. Wu,``Predicting quality of service for selection by neighbourhood-based collaborative filtering,'' IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cyber., Syst., vol. 43, no. 2,Mar. 2013