Google Scholar

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published
Nov 21, 2014
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 22 Download : 24

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

It is observed that the structure in high seismic areas may be susceptible to the sever damage. Safety and minimum damage level of a structure could be the prime requirement of tall buildings. To get these requirement the structure should have adequate lateral strength, lateral stiffness, and sufficient ductility. Now a day shear wall and diagonal bracing are most popular system to resist lateral loads due to earthquake, wind etc. Shear wall has high in plane stiffness and strength which can be used to simultaneously resist large horizontal loads and support gravity loads but the diagonal bracing will be the viable solution for enhancing earthquake resistance. In this study R.C.C  Building  (G+10)  is modelled and analyzed in seven parts i) Model without Shear wall and Bracing (Bare frame). ii) Model with Shear wall providing at corner side. iii) Model with Shear wall providing at perimeter side. iv) Model with Shear wall providing at centre side. v) Model with diagonal bracing at corner side. vi) Model with diagonal  bracing at perimeter side. vii) Model with diagonal  bracing at centre area. The computer aided analysis is done by using E-TAB to find out effective lateral load system during earthquake in high seismic areas.

Key words: R.C. frame, Lateral displacement, Storey shear, Storey drift, Base shear, etc.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Author Biographies

Miss. Pallavi M. Shende, M.S. Bidve Engineering College, Latur-413512

Student (M.E. Civil /Structures)

Dr. A.S. Kasnale, M.S. Bidve Engineering College, Latur-413512

M.E. (Co-ordinator), Associate Professor
How to Cite
Shende, M. P. M., & Kasnale, D. A. (2014). Effect of Diagonal Bracing and Shear Wall in Multi Storied Building. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Science and Technology, 1(09). Retrieved from http://igmpublication.org/ijetst.in/index.php/ijetst/article/view/413

References

1. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA),1997 NEHRP Guidelines for Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings.
2. Applied Technology council, ATC-40,1996, Seismic evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings,Vol-1-2,Redwood City, California.
3. Helmut Krawinkler and G.D.P.k. Seneviratna. Engineering Structures journal, Vol.20.1998 “ Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation”.
4. Jain A.K. “Reinforced Concrete Design(Limit State Design)” Nem Chand and
5. Bros Roorkee (2002).
6. Paz M. “Structural Dynamics” CBS Publication (1992).
7. Park and Pauley, “Reinforced Concrete Structures” A Wiley Inter-science
8. Publication, John Wiley and sons (1999).
9. Definition of shear wall- http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-shear-wall.htm
10. Typical shear wall features, uplift in shear wall, location of shear wall- http://www.abag.ca.gov/bayarea/eqmaps/fi...ld002.htm,http://www.abag.ca.gov/bayarea/eqmaps/fi...sld008.htm
11. Concrete shear wall construction, http://world-housing.net/uploads/concret...f?pr=Array
12. Segmented shear wall design- http://timber.ce.wsu.edu/Supplements/She...rTable.htm
13. Wood framed shear wall construction, http://www.shearwalls.com
14. Bush T. D., Jones ―Behavior of RC frame strengthened using structural steel bracing‖, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 117, No.4, April, 1991 [2] Desai J.P., Jain A.K. and AryaA.S, ―Seismic response of R. C. braced frames‖, Computers and Structures Volume 29 No.4, pp 557568, 1988.